Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
" The choice resides with each observer."

It is not an objective choice then. It's not a scientific choice. They'll have to use something other than the evidence to make their choice. Perhaps they could read some tea leaves.

"Others weigh the evidence as it comes at them and then choose which general understanding is more explanatory."

They must do this extra-logically because you have already agreed that there is no way to make a weighted choice in this matter.
909 posted on 01/06/2006 5:29:23 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman

As long as science is untertaken by human beings it will be subjective to one degree or another.


911 posted on 01/06/2006 5:30:36 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies ]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
They'll have to use something other than the evidence to make their choice.

Are you not using something other than the evidence to assert that "God is not within the purview of science?" You do not know the whole of science or its potential. To say such a thing is ignorant at best.

912 posted on 01/06/2006 5:32:27 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson