Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
namely in refusing to prove how/whether the measure of predictive error complexity applies to organized matter that behaves according to predictable laws

If this is not immediately obvious, you are sufficiently ignorant of the mathematics that I am wasting my time discussing this with you, particularly given your resistance to actually learning mathematics. Come back when you understand the words you are using at a sufficient level that educated humans will have some idea of what you are talking about; there is more to communication than randomly stringing together important sounding words. Just because you cannot understand something does not make it nonsense.

Start with Li and Vitanyi. That book has many of the answers you seek, though I doubt you'll give any consideration to its authority either.

788 posted on 01/05/2006 8:44:24 AM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: tortoise

I specifically asked how/whether this esoteric math, which supposedly defines intelligence more eloquently than a dictionary, is capable of assessing the type or amount of intelligence needed to, for example, build a car. Or is this math simply an attempt at measuring the intelligence that resides within any given entity? Are you too smart to answer these questions in layman's terms?


802 posted on 01/05/2006 10:11:41 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson