Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: puroresu; PatrickHenry
Sounds to me like a close election where one side (the agitated one) got its voters out to the polls and lopsided liberal media coverage did the rest.

ROFL!!! Cling to that if it helps you sleep at night. But come on, be honest -- were the creationists not equally or even more "agitated" by the trial? Why couldn't the creationist side "get its voters out to the polls" in a predominantly REPUBLICAN county? And if you don't think that the creationists weren't producing massive amounts of "lopsided media coverage" of their own, you *really* haven't been paying attention.

544 posted on 01/04/2006 12:25:57 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon

To be completely fair about the outcome of this re-vote, only those who voted the first time were allowed to vote.

What this tells me is that errors in elections that aren't caused by fraud probably wash out in statistics.


563 posted on 01/04/2006 12:49:29 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson