[JTN]

I am amazed the "civil liberatarians" have no care whatsoever for how their efforts will hurt the American people as a whole.

Do you honestly believe that the Islamo-fascists are capable of conquering the U.S.?

[SunSetSam]

I know they are capable of killing us by the thousands. Civil Libertarians see this as acceptable losses to protect their selective opinion of what "civil liberties" are.

[pollyannaish]

Yes.

[TASMANIANRED]

3000 deaths didn't satisfy you.

What does it take 300,000. Can we try to intercept them before they act then or do we still have to be reactive instead of proactive.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

Do you honestly believe that the Islamo-fascists are capable of conquering the U.S.?

If you will accept that destroying is the same, or as bad as, conquering, yes. They are just part of a larger effort. They can certainly do their part to accomplish the goal. They can do more damage and do it quicker than their fellow travelers since they are not even partially constrained by morals, values, or law.

[gakrak]

" Do you honestly believe that the Islamo-fascists are capable of conquering the U.S.?"

With help from the progressives it may be so. Amen.

[Dan Evans]

Do you honestly believe that the Islamo-fascists are capable of conquering the U.S.?

If Al Qaeda could pull off ten attacks every year the size of the WTC attack they would kill fewer Americans than we lose in traffic accidents. As long we don't knuckle under, we are in no danger of being conquered.

But terrorists are called that because the gain power by creating terror. If we respond to their attacks by giving them respect, authority and money we can expect to see more attacks. And if we respond to their attacks by taking liberty from Americans, then we weaken our own ability to defend ourselves.

[expatguy]

"Do you honestly believe that the Islamo-fascists are capable of conquering the U.S.?"

Yes sir I do.