[ccwoman]

Just as long as they are snooping into ALL the students lives and are expelling the ones who are drinking, swearing, having "normal sex" eating too much or committing any other "sin".

[Bismark]

So it is your contention that a Christian school doesn't have the right to be Christian?

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

Just as long as they are snooping into ALL the students lives and are expelling the ones who are drinking, swearing, having "normal sex" eating too much or committing any other "sin".


Most people that committing "other sins" don't try to convince others that their sin is acceptable. It is obvious that these students drew attention to themselves and are testing the waters.

[The Brush]

Just as long as they are snooping into ALL the students lives and are expelling the ones who are drinking, swearing, having "normal sex" eating too much or committing any other "sin".
It must have been obvious behavior if the school picked up on it.
The fact that the children (they are children after all) hired an attorney to demand that the doctrine of the religion of the school be changed to include their behavior suggests that they have no respect for their doctrine their own religion.
A private school should not be bound by public school rules. unless the school is getting public funds, in which case they should return them.

[Galveston Grl]

We are not getting the full story here. I think the gals were flaunting their thing in the school. I don't think snooping was required.

You don't have to treat all teenage misbehavior as the same degree of danger or sin. Brainless "zero tolerance" is for the ethically challenged humanists in the public schools. Bring a gun to school and you are expelled. Draw a pricture of a gun, and you are expelled.

[Mrs. Don-o]

And you, personally, have the authority to tell the Lutheran Church and its affiliated schools how they are to define and prioritize sins because...?