B-52 bombers, Apache gunships, A-10 Warthog jets, artillery and infantry delivered a "devastating" counterattack outside the camp's walls, resulting in more than a dozen confirmed enemy kills, sources told the Daily News. Well done!
1 posted on
12/28/2005 12:59:08 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
"biggest attack" by 400 Terrorists ends with NO American Casualties? Pathetically bad performance by the Terrorists by any military measurement. Stupid Terrorirsts you go BOOOOM now!
2 posted on
12/28/2005 1:00:57 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
To: wagglebee
"The fight is the latest sign that a group now calling itself al-Qaida in Afghanistan is adopting the aggressive tactics used against U.S. forces in Iraq, the Daily News reports, as Washington is increasingly talking about withdrawing from Iraq."
those tactics only work in urban enviroments, out in the open near a U.S Base is more suicide.
Freedom: 1 Jihad:0
3 posted on
12/28/2005 1:02:35 PM PST by
dutch52
To: wagglebee
Some attack. Good guys 400. Jihadists 0.
To: wagglebee
OK, where's the speculation as to how the islamists found out Rumsfeld was going to be there that day?
Anyone besides me picking the New York Times?
6 posted on
12/28/2005 1:05:37 PM PST by
Redbob
To: DevSix; Sarajevo; 2banana
Ping - al-Qaeda and Taliban attack SF camp in Afghanistan.
11 posted on
12/28/2005 1:11:59 PM PST by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: wagglebee
U.S. sources said no Americans were hurtWe get guys hurt running the obstable course, and they can't even nick a guy with a suprise attack by 400 people.
13 posted on
12/28/2005 1:13:46 PM PST by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: wagglebee
I love the dozens to 0 kill ratio.
16 posted on
12/28/2005 1:17:52 PM PST by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: wagglebee
The suicidal assault ...resulting in more than a dozen confirmed enemy kills, sources told the Daily News.
Glad to hear no US casualties, but this story seems somewhat overblown. Describing it as a suicidal assault by 400 enemy with only 12 confrimed kills seems a little less than suicidal to me.
18 posted on
12/28/2005 1:21:07 PM PST by
kabar
To: wagglebee
Al-Qaida Attacked Afghanistan During Donald Rumsfeld's Visit
Thieves Held Up Liquor Store Upon Donald Rumsfeld's Return
19 posted on
12/28/2005 1:25:36 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace Begins in the Womb)
To: wagglebee
I think that the Taliban should get their hands on some old SNL re-runs and check out the Bad Idea Jeans commercials :-)
I can see it now:
(camera show only the jeans of the mujis while they are getting together for a meeting)
Muji #1: Punch SMS'd me and told me that the evil Satan Rumsfeld is coming to visit his troops.
Muji #2: Then they will be distracted and it will be a perfect time to overrun the base.
Voice-over, in booming voice: Bad Idea Jeans!
To: wagglebee
...The suicidal assault...
>>>>>>>
Any assault from these loosers is a suicidal assault.
Thank god for our troops.
27 posted on
12/28/2005 2:44:21 PM PST by
downtoliberalism
("A coalition partner must do more than just express sympathy, a coalition partner must perform,")
To: wagglebee
B-52 bombers, Apache gunships, A-10 Warthog jets, artillery and infantry delivered a "devastating" counterattack outside the camp's walls, resulting in more than a dozen confirmed enemy kills, sources told the Daily News. OK....I have to call B.S. here!
Where were the B-52's based, that they could respond like that? How was the "strike" co-ordinated "outside the walls" as they say?
My B.S. meter is pegging!
30 posted on
12/28/2005 2:48:13 PM PST by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson