Skip to comments.
ILLEGAL-ALIEN BABY BATTLE (14th amendment not intended to grant illegals' offspring citizenship)
NY POST ^
| 12/27/05
| AP
Posted on 12/27/2005 4:32:37 AM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: Fawn
"Jeez----impeachment? That's a bit much...this President is already doing his job times ten and the work that should of been done before him."
I agree, but there is more he could and should be doing. If he would just stand up and say "Enforce the Law", and tell Chertoff to do his job, we could solve this problem.
21
posted on
12/27/2005 3:03:51 PM PST
by
SC33
To: Fawn
"...this President is already doing his job..."
ya think?
satisfied with the 'open' mexican border?
22
posted on
12/28/2005 4:31:59 AM PST
by
1234
(Border control or IMPEACHMENT)
To: Liz
According to Visa International--which is now clamoring for a share of the transfer fees--American money sent South of the Border by illegals constitutes $38 BILLION this year alone constituting Mexico's second largest most profitable industry.Secretary Snow and The Wall -- Earlier this month, U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow paid a friendly visit to Mexico. He met with his Mexican counterpart, Secretary of Hacienda Francisco Gil Díaz.
Snow and Gil Díaz talked about the importance to Mexico of the earnings remitted to home communities and families by migrants in the United States. The two secretaries announced that they had reinforced their commitment to reduce the costs and to facilitate the sending of those family remittances.
Snow said that success hinged on the introduction of private competition to the remittance market, which had reduced the cost of sending money from the U.S. to Mexico by two-thirds since 1999.
snip
This unmitigated contempt for America, and working-class, tax-paying Americans, cannot go unchallenged.
Our government doesn't really give a sh__.
To: gubamyster
To: Liz
I did not grow up close to the border, but in West Texas. My father was a doctor with his own hospital. He complained more than once about watching a car drive around the block numerous times, until it would pull in to the ambulance drive, just in time for the mother to have the baby.
He knew he would see little, if any, money for this delivery. This complaint from a man who would forgive any payment, or take rabbits, etc., or other type of barter for pay.
25
posted on
12/28/2005 5:12:20 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: 1234
The man has alot on his plate the last few years.....hopefully he will get to this border problem in the next few.
26
posted on
12/28/2005 5:16:37 AM PST
by
Fawn
(I got my 'Bo Bice' CD...I'm all set for the Holidays.)
To: mathluv; Fawn; ikka; jv1; Nalu; spectre; DumpsterDiver; Libloather; nmh; BraveMan; Sam's Army; ...
Posted by mathluv: My father was a doctor with his own hospital. He complained more than once about watching a car drive around the block numerous times, until it would pull in to the ambulance drive, just in time for the mother to have the baby. He knew he would see little, if any, money for this delivery. This complaint from a man who would forgive any payment, or take rabbits, etc., or other type of barter for pay. Thanks for the realtime affirmation.
God knows how many times the illegals pulled off this scam, while the US taxpayer keeps paying and paying and paying.
The sense of entitlement these people have is outrageous-----that the rest of us owe them a living.
And that professionals, like mathluv's father, and the US government, exist for their convenience.
27
posted on
12/28/2005 9:07:56 AM PST
by
Liz
(You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
To: Liz
One sad part of this is that my father died in 1970. This memory is from the 50's.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
28
posted on
12/28/2005 9:20:23 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: mathluv
1950's? That does throw a whole new perspective on the problem.
29
posted on
12/28/2005 9:37:26 AM PST
by
Liz
(You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
To: Liz
It's going to take a few more terrorist attacks on WASHINGTON DC and a lot more American deaths to get the Congress to enforce borders and refuse citizenship to illegal babies.
To: Liz
The language of the 14th seems plain enough.
31
posted on
12/28/2005 9:42:01 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Bear_Slayer
WIll we then be working on legislation that shuts the door on Cuba citizens, that gain US citizenship if they can touch foot on US soil. Sure, just as soon as we outlaw trade with Communist China.
32
posted on
12/28/2005 9:46:38 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Liz
It is not new. There is just a much larger number now, and more reason to be concerned afterr 9/11.
Anchor babies have always been desired.
33
posted on
12/28/2005 9:49:25 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: Dr. Scarpetta
I'm afraid you are all too correct.
34
posted on
12/28/2005 9:54:49 AM PST
by
Liz
(You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
To: Wolfie
The only thing between us and camouflage-clad generalissimos patrolling our streets with shoulder holsters...............a Constitution.
35
posted on
12/28/2005 9:58:33 AM PST
by
Liz
(You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
To: Liz
What we need to do is bring this issue back to the front of the debate. The 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to children of illegals!
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
These illegals are not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" therefore they and their children are not citizens. We need to find a way to get this to the Supreme Court and stop creating anchor babies. They are not citizens!!!
36
posted on
09/12/2006 5:40:26 AM PDT
by
upier
("Usted no es agradable en América" "Ahora deporte Illegals")
To: upier; sheana; panthermom; ovrtaxt
What we need to do is bring this issue back to the front of the debate. The 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to children of illegals! All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. These illegals are not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" therefore they and their children are not citizens. We need to find a way to get this to the Supreme Court and stop creating anchor babies. They are not citizens!!! And when those "anchor babies" start voting---watch out.
FReeper ovrtavt said it best:
1 end the anchor baby policy
2 end welfare benefits for non-citizens
3 end subsidized health care and public education for non-citizens
4 swift and harsh jailtime for employers of illegals, plus seizure of assets
5 build a 1951 mile wall from the Pacific to the Gulf
6 allow non-citizens to cross into Mexico with impunity
7 Pass the FairTax
8 overthrow the current Mexican regime and install a non-corrupt, capitalistic government.
37
posted on
09/12/2006 7:51:21 AM PDT
by
Liz
(The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
To: Liz
38
posted on
09/12/2006 8:10:04 AM PDT
by
sheana
To: Liz
Thanks for the compliment!
39
posted on
09/13/2006 2:50:41 AM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(We gotta watch out for the Hellbazoo and the Hamas...)
To: ovrtaxt
My pleasure---yours is one of the best posts on the subject.
40
posted on
09/13/2006 7:30:41 AM PDT
by
Liz
(The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson