Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No happy ending in '05 for Hollywood, as ticket sales drop again
Christian Science Monitor ^ | December 24, 2005 | Daniel B. Wood

Posted on 12/24/2005 4:09:09 PM PST by Daralundy

The slump, now three years running, prompts the industry to ask: 'What's wrong with the movies?'

LOS ANGELES - Hollywood's year-ending good news is that moviegoers are opening hearts and pocketbooks for "King Kong" - more than $60 million on its debut weekend and counting.

The bad news is that audiences did not exactly go ape over the rest of 2005's cinema offerings, making this the third straight year of decline in Hollywood ticket sales - the first such stretch of bad news in 40 years. Because of the continued falloff - sales are down 12.6 percent from 2002 - a growing number of analysts wonder if America's movie habits are changing permanently.

"The industry has to consider whether or not American audiences are sending a message about the quality of the movies they are getting - or just the way and the place in which they get them," says Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, a firm that analyzes box-office trends. "You can bet that producers, writers, directors, and studio heads are all huddling intensely to consider what this means and change their behavior to keep it from continuing."

It could just be a continued shift away from multiplexes toward Blockbuster, Netflix, and other home-viewing options, Mr. Dergarabedian and others say.

In this scenario, consumers are changing their movie-viewing habits because of multiple complaints related to theater-going: soaring ticket costs, high parking and candy-concession prices, and, perhaps, decreased enjoyment of the movie-house experience because of unruly audiences and growing numbers of on-screen ads.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2005review; boxoffice; hollyweird; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: Daralundy
The slump, now three years running, prompts the industry to ask: 'What's wrong with the movies?'

No originality -- who wants to see a remake of what they saw before, movie or TV:

And that's just in 2005!

-PJ

41 posted on 12/24/2005 4:48:36 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Ha, reminds me. They have a Bareback Mountain commercial out that presents it as a "Great American Love Story". The commercial only shows the guys with their wives, but no showing at all of what the movie is really about. Schmucks.


42 posted on 12/24/2005 4:50:42 PM PST by kenth (Come back here... so that I may brain thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
Let's see ... Syriana, Jarhead, Brokeback Mountain, Memoirs of a Geisha, Munich, Good Night and Good Luck, Paradise Now ...

And they wonder why box office receipts are down?

43 posted on 12/24/2005 4:50:43 PM PST by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
The bad news is that audiences did not exactly go ape over the rest of 2005's cinema offerings, making this the third straight year of decline in Hollywood ticket sales - the first such stretch of bad news in 40 years.

Good. Every dollar Hollywood (and the Screen Actors Guild union thugs) loses is one less dollar they can give to Dem candidates.
44 posted on 12/24/2005 4:52:58 PM PST by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
You are correct about Hitch. I was hoping for a good romantic comedy and this wasn't it. The girl is not nearly hot enough to explain why the supposedly smooth Will Smith gets so flustered around her.

The editing was bad. If you notice the editing it is bad editing.

This movie isn't even a good rental.

So I agree that part of the reason for the fall off in box office is the rise of home theater. I have a 10 foot wide screen. There are very few movies that are better in the theater than on my home screen. Mainly I like to watch comedies in the theater to get a good audience response. But there are very few good comedies. (the 40 year old virgin is surprisingly good)
45 posted on 12/24/2005 4:53:01 PM PST by djwright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

You may be protecting your health by not going to theaters. I heard this guy on a radio talk show a year or two ago who calls himself "Dr. Germ." Dr. Germ and his assistant go around the country studying different public places, taking culture samples and such to determine which places are the most hazardous. Anyway, Dr. Germ said the seats in all the movie theaters he tested were tainted with human fecal matter.


46 posted on 12/24/2005 4:53:17 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I had to pick something up at Walmarts today. It sounded like an ER waiting room. People hacking all over the place.


47 posted on 12/24/2005 4:58:34 PM PST by CindyDawg (Merry Christmas to all and to all a good evening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

With high definition and surround sound, the only thing missing that's still at the the 'plex is the gum on the floor and spilt drinks, which I guess I could do at home if I get nostalgic.

I suppose I could set up a tape recorder with coughing and voices behind me to round out the "theater experience."


48 posted on 12/24/2005 4:59:24 PM PST by at bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Well, I admit I saw three of those in the movie theater and one other on DVD.

Of the rest, no wish to see any of them any time or any place.


49 posted on 12/24/2005 5:00:04 PM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

So many sheep, so little time.


50 posted on 12/24/2005 5:00:24 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

If we could demand our money back at any time during a movie or return a DVD, then they would really be crying.


51 posted on 12/24/2005 5:02:47 PM PST by CindyDawg (Merry Christmas to all and to all a good evening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: katya8
Maybe Hollywood should ask itself, "Why do they hate us?"

Touche!

52 posted on 12/24/2005 5:03:25 PM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
opening hearts and pocketbooks for "King Kong" - more than $60 million on its debut weekend and counting.

What abject spin! It cost $200 million plus I read they spent another $50 million in promotion and all they've got back is a paltry $60 million in the initial release. Of course the income will only slow greatly from this point. I wouldn't want to be out $190 million, would you? And that's the good news.

The movie itself always seemed kind of weird to me. I'm not saying I was offended by it, but just the premise is strange, giant ape loves human woman. I mean, if things worked out to a happy ending, what would we end up with, human on monkey sex? Plus the size difference makes it yet more freaky. Maybe the original was viewed more as humans touching the face of nature, but these days there'll be a more logical, literal translation that audiences expect to pan out in some reasonable way. Definitely don't need three hours of this crap.
53 posted on 12/24/2005 5:04:01 PM PST by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Anyway, Dr. Germ said the seats in all the movie theaters he tested were tainted with human fecal matter.

Must've done his testing after the midnight showing of Brokeback Mountain.

54 posted on 12/24/2005 5:04:09 PM PST by Archie Bunker on steroids (All liberal agenda roads lead to San Francisco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
I hope you didn't pick up a bug. I found a story on Dr. Germ.
Merry Christmas to You and all FReepers.

http://www.uagrad.org/Alumnus/w05/germ.html
55 posted on 12/24/2005 5:10:34 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
The cost, the parking, the audiences etc. wouldn't matter if the product was decent. The problem is, the movies SUCK!

They keep doing rehashes of the older movies that made money because they don't have any new ideas. Perhaps it's because they're all democrats ;o)

56 posted on 12/24/2005 5:11:13 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
"cool was way better with Bogart, Grant and the Duke"

When I want to see a movie it might be one I saw years ago but a second or third viewing of Liberty Valence or Treasure of Sierra Madre certainly beats the crap hollywood has been making recently.

Also TV has never been better. My daughter bought entire seasons of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Combat and Paladin for me for Christmas. For the cost of one month of cable you can have forty hours of Andy Griffith dvds. Now thats entertainment!

Of course the a$$holes currently in hollywood get none of my money.
57 posted on 12/24/2005 5:11:59 PM PST by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Perhaps the theaters will go the way of the drive-ins."

I predict that in the not-to-distant future this will be the case. Also, the day will come when the Daily Newspaper's printed page will be obsolete. With the internet and a gazillion cable and satellite news networks, who needs to go outside in bad weather and get the paper and get news ink on their hands.


58 posted on 12/24/2005 5:14:26 PM PST by no dems ("99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name." Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Didn't Bareback Buttbottom pull Hollywood's ass out of the fire?


59 posted on 12/24/2005 5:14:36 PM PST by zarf (The BCS sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

"Dr. Germ said the seats in movie theaters were tainted with human fecal matter"

Well of course, its falling off the screen.


60 posted on 12/24/2005 5:15:38 PM PST by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson