Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why is there a need to defend such a sensible thing, to try to prevent a major catastrophy of a nuclear attack on a US city?!

Has the entire country gone mad?

1. People object to simple, useful measures to try to prevent such an attack.

2. Top secret information is disclosed by our domestic enemies, which seriously harms national security, endangering OUR lives.

3. Now they are disclosing that the program was stopped, so the terrorists in the US don;t have to worry that we may discover where they are hiding the nukes they plan to detonate.

""Asked about the program's status, the official said, "I'd understood it had been stopped or significantly rolled back" as early as eight months ago."

1 posted on 12/23/2005 7:07:19 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: FairOpinion
I believe when worshipers coming out of a Mosque start glowing in the dark it's probably pretty good sign that they have radio active material...


2 posted on 12/23/2005 7:10:07 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
STOPPED!

These useless effin Liberals are dead set on getting us all killed. It's damn time we start demanding special prosecutors for the leaker's, if we can have a special prosecutor assigned to the hose bag Valerie Plame's outing, we damn sure need a special prosecutor for these last two top secret leaks

3 posted on 12/23/2005 7:12:08 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

I would say if they weren't doing such a thing, federal authorities would be irresponsible and incompetent. People that think this is all a game are too dense to bother engaging in argument.


4 posted on 12/23/2005 7:13:13 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

So when, under a Democrat-led administration, authorities decide that niceties such as search warrants are not required, you'll be happy to have BATF agents search your place for tobacco remains, as part of the war-on-cancer?


5 posted on 12/23/2005 7:13:16 PM PST by sadimgnik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

H A RD TO TYP HE AD BOUT TO XPL ODE


6 posted on 12/23/2005 7:16:56 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
"Why is there a need to defend such a sensible thing, to try to prevent a major catastrophy of a nuclear attack on a US city?!"

Because the media deliberately misrepresents or sensationalizes their stories in order to create a mood of suspicion in America. They want to bring the Bush Administration down and will do anything to succeed. Dishonesty, deception and publishing national security secrets are mere minor details as far as the msm are concerned.

"Has the entire country gone mad?"

You could write a whole book to answer this question. Suffice to say half the country is going either pagan, socialist, communist, homosexual, or in general falling into a mood of rebellion against what is good and right. The media are the liars and rabble rousers behind this movement.

8 posted on 12/23/2005 7:18:34 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion


Shouldn't someone be in jail for blabbing about this? In the cell next to the person who blabbed about the NSA last week?


9 posted on 12/23/2005 7:20:46 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

""Has the entire country gone mad?""

I believe it's on the verge of a complete nervous breakdown.


11 posted on 12/23/2005 7:23:45 PM PST by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
I suppose if law enforcement heard screaming, they couldn't listen to it without a warrant, according to the MSM.

How does radiation monitoring constitute a 'search?' All they are doing is capturing RELEASED particles.

The MSM is either stupid or deliberately pretending to be.

13 posted on 12/23/2005 7:27:44 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

What's with Matt Drudge??

He's got this story on a HUGE banner headline. He led the charge on the NSA story too, in big red letters (literally). Michelle Malkin sort of took him behind the woodshed for it.

I like Drudge's site, but does he play both sides sometimes, or what?


16 posted on 12/23/2005 7:30:38 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

That monitoring program sounds like a good idea.

But come to think of it, what about the muslim food? Some of that spiced meat smothered in raw onions, a little hummus on the side.

The resulting gas emissions could set off a flurry of false alarms on those radiation detectors.


17 posted on 12/23/2005 7:31:24 PM PST by reasonisfaith (To become an atheist you must think like a one year old infant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

This could set precedents for meth lab prosecutions, where the clanlab guys track down a lab by the smells of cooking meth, from public land.

And some city PDs issue pocket radiation detectors, that look like beepers or cell phones.


18 posted on 12/23/2005 7:32:31 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
U.S. News and World Report first reported the program on Friday.

Aren't there criminal sanctions for revealing classified information? Let me know when the b*stards are in jail and their facility shuttered.

20 posted on 12/23/2005 7:34:47 PM PST by Tax Government (Defeat the evil donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
"Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based civil rights arab terrorist group,...

There:
fixed!

21 posted on 12/23/2005 7:36:37 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Can we legally monitor smoke and polluted water emissions without a search warrant?
22 posted on 12/23/2005 7:38:04 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
"Has the entire country gone mad?"

Sure looks like it. The same fools who are so concerned about extending gun control are now all bent out of shape protecting Muslim rights to have nukes in their mosques. Go figure!

23 posted on 12/23/2005 7:39:19 PM PST by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Members of the far left are trying very hard to bring this nation down. Where do they plan to be when it happens? How are they going to keep their own families safe, since they seem to be telling the rest of us to go to hell?


25 posted on 12/23/2005 7:40:40 PM PST by Just Lori (End the leftist occupation of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
From the American Thinker:

Another suicidal national security leak

Media outlets are now racing each other to expose vital national security secrets to mass-murdering terrorists. US News & World Report just gave our enemies another tip(Reuters:Mosques monitered for radioactive material:report): Don't store your dirty bomb materials in a mosque.

The US has been monitoring for radioactive materials in US mosques, because if you want to kill a lot of people, the dirty bomb is your weapon of choice. All it takes is some uranium or radium in a truck full of dynamite. If the 9/11 terrorists had carried radioactive materials on board their four hijacked aircraft, we would now be digging bomb shelters in our gardens.

As a result of this criminal leak of a vital program, future terrorists will be sure to store their radioactive materials outside of mosques. Now we do not know where to look.

Thank you, mainstream media. You may kill us all yet, but you will defend the public's right to know to the last man, woman and child in the United States.

It is past time to prosecute leakers and "journalists" to the full extent of the law. The US Constitution is not a suicide pact...posted by Editor approx.10PMEST

.............

What in the hell do we have to do to get these fools to STFU.

26 posted on 12/23/2005 7:40:42 PM PST by smoothsailing (MERRY CHRISTMAS FREEPERS !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
"This creates the appearance that Muslims are targeted simply for being Muslims. I don't think this is the message the government wants to send at this time," he said.

Sounds to me like the prudent and responsible thing to do.

28 posted on 12/23/2005 7:47:48 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Surely even the left would give us some slack looking for them pesky nukes. No.

Examples of what our better educated, more compassionate, open minded leftist friends feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel. (Not DU)

"Let's get all of this c*** out in the open, so the rest of the country can see just exactly what these b******s have been up to."

(Of course, there were comparisons to sending Japanese and Americans of Japanese descent to "internment" camps.)

(and of course) racial profiling!!

(and of course, racism!!) "makes my blood boil. Everything an excuse to practice racism. Sick"

(the victims of Bush) "you are seeing the numbers growing exponentially"

(and of course, threats) Bush, stop making war on "us." We're asking you nicely just one more time."

End of summary (They really, really feeeeeel strongly about this. They lifted the restriction on how many times you could use the F-word in a sentence.)

To be fair a couple (out of about 200) did acknowledge that just maybe there may be a need to worry about those pesky nuke thingies. They hate Bush nevertheless.

The single truthful statement on the site was, "We had a saying, back in the 60s: 'Question Authority.' After awhile, we turned to Thoreau: 'Stop the Machine!'"

Well, there it is. Today's left. Still hoping to "bring it all down, man."

None of these "issues" is about rights. The issue is not the issue. It's about "bring it all down, man" and has been for decades. It's about whose America survives.

34 posted on 12/23/2005 8:09:05 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson