Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SACKED AND I'M FUMING (Fired for smoking)
The Mirror ^ | 12/23/05 | Richard Smith

Posted on 12/23/2005 7:13:34 AM PST by Millee

SACKED smoker Sophie Blinman threatened to take her former employers to court yesterday, fuming: "I'm furious. Surely this is discrimination."

Stunned Sophie, 21, was given the boot 45 minutes after starting her new job even though she promised not to light up in office hours.

Her bosses declared: "It's positive discrimination and we're proud of it." Experts agreed the company was not breaking the law. But smokers' pressure group Forest said: "This is outrageous."

Sophie, who smokes five to 10 cigarettes a day, was delighted to land her £6-an-hour job as an administrator at Dataflow Communications.

She said: "I dressed smartly, arrived in good time and was about to be taken on a tour of the offices when I was asked if I smoked. When I said I did, I immediately sensed a problem.

"I explained I'd happily wait until my lunch break to smoke, and leave the premises to do so. But I was told the company didn't employ smokers and there was no longer a position for me.

"I can't believe a business is allowed to have a policy against employing smokers. I was never even asked at my interview if I smoked."

Threatening legal action, Sophie, of Shepton Mallet, Somerset, added: "This has left me angered and unemployed. I shall be seeking legal advice."

Dataflow, which employs 20 workers at its offices in Wells, advertises its non-smokers policy on its website.

Managing director Fran Edwards said: "All our employees have been recruited on this basis. We can't make an exception."

Information Services boss Ian Murray added: "We didn't ask Sophie at her interview if she was a smoker because we assumed the agency that sent her only asked non-smokers to apply."

Employment lawyer Frank Ryan said: "This is unusual, but it doesn't breach the law. Sophie won't qualify for unfair dismissal but she might challenge on the grounds of human rights."

Forest said: "Only smokers can be discriminated against without penalty."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: fired; libertarians; pufflist; smoking; smokingandfuming; wodlist; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-194 next last
To: Go Gordon
Whats the difference whether the descimination occurred during the interview, or after her hiring?

Discrimination is a good thing.

121 posted on 12/23/2005 9:32:49 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
A have a prediction: companies in the future will give physicals to all prospective employees and those who don't "measure up" will not be hired

Hmm, I had to take a physical when I started my first full time "job" (two actually), but that was the US Air Force. :) Still when I started my first job after grad school, in '77, I had to take a physical. I had injured my knee in a diving board mishap a couple of days before and was on crutches. So for 20+ years I had a "profile" that said I couldn't be assigned any work that required squatting or certain other movements or positions, even though *that* knee healed up fine within a few weeks. The other knee OTOH ....

122 posted on 12/23/2005 9:32:58 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Except I would have a small chuckle if the policy came back to bite the company in the hindquarters.

Me, too. If they choose to enact a stupid policy, then they deserve to feel the market's repercussions. But each company (just like each individual) should have the right to be stupid if they want.

123 posted on 12/23/2005 9:35:32 AM PST by Choose Ye This Day (Win the war. Confirm the judges. Cut the taxes. Control the spending. Secure the border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
Are they going to fire people who drink too much? Are overweight? Eat too much junk food? Race motorcycles on the weekend?

I don't know, but they should be able to if the want.

124 posted on 12/23/2005 9:36:56 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Or being White, Black, Indian, Obese, female, male, any age over 18, short, tall, what size shoe you wear, your hair color, etc.

Discrimination is discrimination.
125 posted on 12/23/2005 9:36:58 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
I was doing a job interview once, and the lady I was interviewing asked if I minded if she smoked.

My secretary, a smoker, as was I, said "Hire her Bob, right now". She got the job BECAUSE she smoked.

Sounds like Phillip Morris. Everyone smokes there, but God help you if you light up a Camel.

126 posted on 12/23/2005 9:37:54 AM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

True.


127 posted on 12/23/2005 9:38:20 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: xrp
You wouldn't go to the beach and get mai tais and margaritas without the salt?

Nah, vodka in a warm Russian kitchen with pilmeni and some really good company would beat that.

128 posted on 12/23/2005 9:38:55 AM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne

There is a slight distinction. Discrimination against somebody who has no control over the condition being discrimated against is, I think, worse than discrimination against behaviors that we choose.

I don't choose my age, sex (usually), ethnicity, nationality or gender.

I do choose my health and hygiene habits, my beliefs, my sexual preferences and proclivities and my communication abilities.


129 posted on 12/23/2005 9:40:46 AM PST by Choose Ye This Day (Win the war. Confirm the judges. Cut the taxes. Control the spending. Secure the border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

What about a mixed race couple, that is choice and there is nothing wrong with it. How about a Christian and a Jewish person?

How about a Canadian and an American?

All choices, all legal and acceptable.


130 posted on 12/23/2005 9:44:49 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Discrimination is a good thing.

Someone once told me that I had descriminating taste. I took it as a compliment.

131 posted on 12/23/2005 9:48:46 AM PST by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: billbears
The intent under the Constitution was not meant to apply to private companies but only a list of limitations of the national government

While it is true that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are restrictions on the government, it's also true that corporations are creations of the government. The only rights they have are those the government gives them. They are not people, although under the law the government chooses to treat them as such for *some* purposes.

In essence a corporation is designed to take risk away from investors, and put it on those who sell things to it, or loan it money. It goes back to the days when the Dutch were the big commercial power in the world. Some of the earlier companies include Hudson's Bay Company and the East India company, although those were both British.

132 posted on 12/23/2005 9:51:12 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

Yes, there are lakes and boats for water skiing. Up in New England skiing on water is called water skiing, skiing on snow is simply called skiing. When I first her the term 'snow skiing' I had to stop and think what they were talking about.


133 posted on 12/23/2005 9:51:18 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The seamstress would be Fatima.

Please pick another name Fatima is a Freeper in good standing.

134 posted on 12/23/2005 9:54:17 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: billbears
And if you do so you are limiting the rights of the company.

Which is perfectly OK, since companies are creations of the State anyway. They aren't people. People have rights, companies only what we would call privileges, although the terms were often interchangeable up to well past the US civil war.

135 posted on 12/23/2005 9:54:43 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Someone once told me that I had discriminating taste. I took it as a compliment.

It usually is.

136 posted on 12/23/2005 9:55:44 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Millee
"It's positive discrimination and we're proud of it."

Discrimination with a positive twist, eh?

What next?

137 posted on 12/23/2005 9:59:20 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

But I thought England has socialized medicine? Her employers wouldn't pay for her health care then, would they?


138 posted on 12/23/2005 9:59:44 AM PST by VaGunGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
One is filthy disgusting behavior, the other is a filthy disgusting behavior sanctioned by the liberal nanny State.

Let's be prudent and ban ALL filthy and disgusting behavior!

My heart bleeds for those who make the determination as to what is defined as filthy and disgusting.

139 posted on 12/23/2005 10:03:27 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
I have worked at my job for 19 years. Do you believe the owner has the right to now change the terms of my employment and insist that I give up snow skiing, waterskiing, target shooting, hunting, my sports car, my beer-drinking and my occassional cigar, or else be fired?

I didn't say I agreed with the policy, just that it will happen. It's already beginning in fact, or we would not be having this discussion.

But I would agree that a partnership or sole proprietorship could fire you for any reason it chose. But a corporation, either a privately or publicly held one, is a creature of the State, and is thus subject to whatever limitations the State might choose to apply to it. Of course the State is a pretty stupid beast as well, and may (will!) exercise it's powers unwisely. But it does have those powers over corporations.

140 posted on 12/23/2005 10:05:16 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson