Skip to comments.
GOA - Fight Gun Registration Provisions in PATRIOT Act
EMail ^
| 12-21-2005
| Gun Owners of America
Posted on 12/21/2005 8:39:03 AM PST by jmc813
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-270 next last
1
posted on
12/21/2005 8:39:04 AM PST
by
jmc813
To: jmc813
I wonder what the Patriot Act cheerleaders think about this one. They're only looking for terrorists, so we should just accept this, right?
To: jmc813
3
posted on
12/21/2005 8:45:12 AM PST
by
commonerX
(n)
To: jmc813
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".
Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it.
Let Freedom Ring,
Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v4.0 download page!
4
posted on
12/21/2005 8:49:32 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
5
posted on
12/21/2005 8:50:22 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: antiRepublicrat
I'd like to see the statistics on terrorists who buy weapons from retail sales outlets. Gangs obviously don't. I sincerely doub terrorists do either. Folks looking to do something bad with a weapon don't sign their name on forms purchasing it.
6
posted on
12/21/2005 8:50:28 AM PST
by
x5452
To: antiRepublicrat
They can already do this, it's just the ATF and they turn them over to the FBI. No real change, except for the proviso 'suspect involved in terrorism'.
7
posted on
12/21/2005 8:56:06 AM PST
by
Tarpon
To: jmc813
8
posted on
12/21/2005 8:57:53 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
To: antiRepublicrat
Consistency would demand that response.
9
posted on
12/21/2005 8:57:59 AM PST
by
aligncare
(I used to think the Democrats were just wrong...Now, I know better.)
To: antiRepublicrat
If you are against the Patriot Act, you love the terrorists and wish to see America consumed by flames. And, by the way, don't pay attention to that click on your phone. It is nothing.
10
posted on
12/21/2005 8:59:18 AM PST
by
lugsoul
("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
To: Joe Brower
11
posted on
12/21/2005 9:00:31 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: aligncare
A call for consistency means you hate our great nation, love the terrorists and teach your children Satanic rituals. Let us see your papers. Now.
12
posted on
12/21/2005 9:00:41 AM PST
by
lugsoul
("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
To: antiRepublicrat
"
I wonder what the Patriot Act cheerleaders think about this one. They're only looking for terrorists, so we should just accept this, right?"
Cheerleaders?
Is that akin to being a Bushbot?
BTW ... Have YOU contacted YOUR Senators and Congressional representative about this, or do you simply wish to start a skirmish?
![](http://www.opinionjournal.com/images/storyend_dingbat.gif)
13
posted on
12/21/2005 9:01:01 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(Others have died for my freedom; now this is my mark ... Marine Corporal Jeffrey Starr, KIA 04-30-05)
To: lugsoul
And, by the way, don't pay attention to that click on your phone. It is nothing. I use VOIP, so they can't tap my end -- yet. But when they can there won't even be a click.
To: jmc813
The PATRIOT Act needs to be cleaned up. The current bill, as amended, has all kinds of crap in it that has nothing whatsoever to do with protecting us from terrorists.
Also, they are trying to make some of it permanent, which is foolish and shortsighted. Do we want Democrats to have that kind of power to abuse someday?
15
posted on
12/21/2005 9:03:46 AM PST
by
B Knotts
To: Tarpon
No real change, except for the proviso 'suspect involved in terrorism'. That proviso allows the FBI to do it without a warrant.
To: antiRepublicrat
I wonder what the Patriot Act cheerleaders think about this one. They're only looking for terrorists, so we should just accept this, right? Even if Bush signed it, which won't happen since he will veto it, the SC would certainly strike it down.
:-/
17
posted on
12/21/2005 9:05:42 AM PST
by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: G.Mason
Have YOU contacted YOUR Senators and Congressional representative about this Actually, yes. I like contacting them, and have done so several times over the past few years on issues. I even called the office a bunch of times. I plan to schedule a sit-down chat one of these days.
To: antiRepublicrat
I use VOIP, so they can't tap my end -- yet. But when they can there won't even be a click. Sure they can't.
BTW, your opposition to this necessary law enforcement tool creates a valid suspicion that you are an Agent of a Foreign Power, that you are a terrorist supporter, and your rights as a US citizen have now been revoked. They may even get around to telling you about it some day.
19
posted on
12/21/2005 9:07:10 AM PST
by
lugsoul
("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
To: antiRepublicrat
This is just another poison pill by the 'Rats that wasn't in the first Patriot Act.
20
posted on
12/21/2005 9:08:40 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-270 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson