Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper
Curious... three staright days of public addresses. Perhaps he's gotten the message that he must be more aggressive cutting through the media filter.

Frankly, I hope he continues to do this every day. The MSM needs some balance.

3 posted on 12/19/2005 5:39:39 AM PST by kevkrom ("Zero-sum games are transactions mostly initiated by thieves and governments." - Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
The MSM needs some balance.

This my friend is a huge understatement!

7 posted on 12/19/2005 5:41:21 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

Bush should have done this two years ago. It stinks of desperation now.


60 posted on 12/19/2005 6:27:46 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
Perhaps he's gotten the message that he must be more aggressive cutting through the media filter.

I believe he has learned he has to do some PR work. The MSM does nothing but attack him every hour of every day.

73 posted on 12/19/2005 6:43:04 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

You sure got that right.


182 posted on 12/19/2005 7:38:47 AM PST by octobersky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

I have never understood why the Republicans don't get a bunch of very wealthy people and fund managers together and buy a controlling interest in these big companies that own ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Washington Post, etc., and then put in a new board of directors and change the political orientations of these outlets. All they do is complain about media bias. The Communist Party and the Democratic Party have their own media outlets, why don't the Republicans?


191 posted on 12/19/2005 7:39:57 AM PST by LibertarianCandidate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
Perhaps he's gotten the message that he must be more aggressive cutting through the media filter.

Hopefully he's fired Nicole Devenish and Dan Bartlett.

275 posted on 12/19/2005 7:47:14 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
What it means is, is that he is having to respond to everything that he is doing. If you have to explain it each time, then something is wrong. Obviously, some are not getting his message. This domestic spying crap bothers me. If the imperial federal government can arbitrarily point to you and say, "he is a spy" then what stops the government from doing anything else? Each and every time the government gets away with something that we think is wrong, it becomes precedent and they continue to do it because they got away with it before. This is more big brother, more big government. We have laws for a purpose. So, now we are just going around the ones they deem inappropriate. This bothers the hell out of me.
456 posted on 12/19/2005 8:02:46 AM PST by RetiredArmy (I have no faith in any politician or political party any more. They all lie for their agendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson