Skip to comments.
At the Times, a Scoop Deferred
Washington Post ^
| December 17, 2005
| Paul Farhi
Posted on 12/17/2005 9:17:35 AM PST by AliVeritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: AliVeritas
The NY Times is run by degenerate homosexuals.
2
posted on
12/17/2005 9:19:02 AM PST
by
boomop1
To: AliVeritas
The president said today in his radio address that contrary to the left's assertion that they hadn't known about this spying, he has briefed Congress about this matter dozens of times!
3
posted on
12/17/2005 9:19:31 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: boomop1
degenerate homosexuals Redundant? Redundant?
4
posted on
12/17/2005 9:21:14 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: AliVeritas
The article suggests the Times waited til the Patriot Act renewal vote in order to have a "news peg." Right. I'm sure there was nothing in the last year that would have otherwise made the story relevant to readers...
5
posted on
12/17/2005 9:22:12 AM PST
by
BackInBlack
("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
To: AliVeritas
I'd like to see the Ethics Committee look into why Chucky Schumer was pimping Risen's "book" on the floor of the Senate. That is exactly what he was doing when he was whining about this while waving a copy of the NYT in the air.
6
posted on
12/17/2005 9:23:21 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: peyton randolph
7
posted on
12/17/2005 9:25:01 AM PST
by
boomop1
To: boomop1
Bush Spied and Nobody Died!
8
posted on
12/17/2005 9:27:33 AM PST
by
fsorbello
(Liberalism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere can take care of themselves.)
To: AliVeritas
Gee sort of like all the other "Bush scandals". Media hype to boost "News Media" attention to a book published by the hyping organizations parent company. Sort of the "Richard Clarke" school of mass marketing.
9
posted on
12/17/2005 9:27:54 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("My job as the President is to see the world the way it is, not the way we hope it is." -GW Bush)
To: fsorbello
NO SPIES FOR OIL !!!
10
posted on
12/17/2005 9:29:10 AM PST
by
cmsgop
( Bill Clinton's License Plate..... "Herpes 1")
To: AliVeritas
In the ensuing months, Keller wrote, two things changed the paper's thinking. The paper developed a fuller picture of misgivings about the program by some in the government. And the paper satisfied itself through more reporting that it could write the story without exposing "any intelligence-gathering methods or capabilities that are not already on the public record." In other words the Slimes spent a year trying to find out their legal status should the spill they beans
11
posted on
12/17/2005 9:29:21 AM PST
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: Peach
Good point! If the congress was unaware of this how did the slimes know about it a year earlier?
12
posted on
12/17/2005 9:30:30 AM PST
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: AliVeritas
...raised eyebrows in political and media circlesThe heck it did.
That's SSDD at the NYT.
13
posted on
12/17/2005 9:31:41 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Peach
he has briefed Congress about this matter dozens of times!I want names. Anyone got 'em? Limbaugh's already mentioned Rockefeller.
14
posted on
12/17/2005 9:32:42 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: AliVeritas
I am looking forward to watching the Bush administration defend this for three reasons:
1) The drama associated with the Friday release... obvious media manipulation (again).
2) The motives (book release, patriot act, CIA leak lost steam, CIA old timer power play, perhaps all of the above and more
3) The Bush team is pushing back harder and holds all of the cards in this... the cat is out of the bag and a revelation about what kind of people we spyed on and what they were planning is just what the country needs and the last things the dems need (a plank of protecting the civil rights of terrorists in their platform).
pop some corn, here we go (again)
To: mewzilla
Limbaugh mentioned Rockefeller? Is he sure, do you think or is he guessing?
16
posted on
12/17/2005 9:36:26 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: AliVeritas; All
Wanna REALLY get your blood pressure up??
Google: James Risen NYT
Read the TOP story in response to the president's radio address....
17
posted on
12/17/2005 9:37:49 AM PST
by
musicman
To: Peach
Limbaugh sounded certain to me. And he mentioned that rumpswab more than once.
18
posted on
12/17/2005 9:42:53 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
Thanks for that info. Perfect name for Rockefeller. ROFL
19
posted on
12/17/2005 9:43:21 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: AliVeritas
This is no big deal. I remember the Times publishing similar ominous articles about the Clinton administration just before Gary Aldrich's book came out.
Oh, wait. That never happened.
20
posted on
12/17/2005 9:44:00 AM PST
by
Maceman
(Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson