Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Cornyn: Filibuster of PATRIOT Act "a Return to Pre-9/11 Mindset"
NRO: The Corner ^ | December 16, 2005 | John Cornyn

Posted on 12/16/2005 10:02:11 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Shermy
There are provisions in the new version the address methanphetamine production and trafficking. While I hate meth and meth dealers, I think it sets a dangerous precedent. Common criminals are being lumped in with terrorists. Law enforcement is using the "patriot act" against citizens that have no link to terrorism.
21 posted on 12/16/2005 10:35:20 AM PST by RambozoDClown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Yep and it will pay dividends if handled correctly....

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2005/12/house-approves-extension-of-patriot.html


22 posted on 12/16/2005 10:39:21 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I like the fact that most of the patriot Act was originally temporary. I think that most laws Congress passes should have sunset provisions. They'll reach a point where all they can do is renew old law instead of passing new ones.

The real test of a law is "Do you want your opponents enforcing it?" Can you imagine what this country would be like if President Hillary had the power to order the FBI to make warrantless searches on whoever she wanted?

23 posted on 12/16/2005 10:39:36 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In memory of Alvin Owen, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang and Yee Chen Lin:the victims of Tookie Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RambozoDClown

Remember the good old days when going into the library was reserved for Democrats to check up on Clarence Thomas?


24 posted on 12/16/2005 10:41:06 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun; the gillman@blacklagoon.com
I'd like to see more info on this, got a link?

Nope, no link ... and no clue .. not many can measure up to the gillman's purity test.

25 posted on 12/16/2005 10:42:17 AM PST by tx_eggman (If we had some bacon we could have bacon and eggs ... if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"By choosing to filibuster the Patriot Act, critical law enforcement tools will lapse, investigations into terrorist activities will be halted."

That's a pretty bald faced lie even for a politician.

Makes for a great sound bite though. Without the Patriot Act, terrorists have become fully enabled. It is impossible to stop them from acting! Law enforcemnt will overnight be rendered powerless!

26 posted on 12/16/2005 10:44:35 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"By choosing to filibuster the Patriot Act, critical law enforcement tools will lapse, investigations into terrorist activities will be halted."

That's a pretty bald faced lie even for a politician.


Actually, it's not a lie. Critical law enforcement tools WILL lapse as a result of this and, because of this lapse, there WILL be investigations into terrorist activities that will have to be halted. Those investigations DEPEND upon powers granted by the Patriot Act.
27 posted on 12/16/2005 10:50:36 AM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

One of the Sections which will not be renewed was the Section that took down Gorelick's wall.

Gorelick's wall is now back up.


28 posted on 12/16/2005 10:52:28 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("My job as the president is to see the world the way it is, not the way we hope it is." - W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The real test of a law is "Do you want your opponents enforcing it?" Can you imagine what this country would be like if President Hillary had the power to order the FBI to make warrantless searches on whoever she wanted?

The problem is in your premise and your assumptions. A President Hillary would do whatever she wants no matter what LEGAL powers are given to her. Much like what she did when she was just a lowly First Lady.

If the other team doesn't play by the rules, it doesn't matter what the rules say.
29 posted on 12/16/2005 10:56:07 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("My job as the president is to see the world the way it is, not the way we hope it is." - W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Good post over there.....


30 posted on 12/16/2005 10:56:15 AM PST by b4its2late (There are good terrorists - dead ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

good point, this constant argument about "what if Hillary becomes president" is a non-starter. did laws against having FBI files, or using the IRS, stop them before?


31 posted on 12/16/2005 11:00:14 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Despite the fact that I wholeheartedly disagree with Sununu on this subject, your insinuation is beyond ignorant and moving quickly toward racist (and that is not a word I throw around lightly). I know John Sununu personally and he is one of the finest human beings I have ever encountered. His character is such, that I am shocked that he made the decision to enter politics.
Secondly, my godfather is also a Lebanese Christian and I take personal offense to your obnoxious implication that someone's ethnicity makes them less of a Patriot than you, just because you disagree with their opinion. It's ignorant fools like you that make it easy for libs to label the rest of us conservatives as small-minded racists.
Grow up!


32 posted on 12/16/2005 11:02:14 AM PST by go-dubya-04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: go-dubya-04
I'll grow up when the facts are faced. Arabs want us dead. Have you noticed the situation in Israel for the past many decades.

Have you noticed the celebrating by the people in the middle east when we are attacked. Have you noticed that there are many Lebanese who are on the side of the Syrians.

Have you noticed that the arab world hates our guts.

When we are afraid to find the truth by any means necessary because someone's privacy might be breached I ask you what privacy do the 3,000 dead Americans have.

Were you among those who supported Congerssman Weldon for exposing the truth about what was discovered in Able Danger?

People who want the truth to be hidden are willing to sacrifice our lives for some lofty ideal.

33 posted on 12/16/2005 11:12:11 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

If my a "return to pre-9/11 mindset" he means the mindset of a free, liberty loving country that is wary of a powerful federal government, I agree and applaud.

Somehow I doubt that's what he meant however.


34 posted on 12/16/2005 11:16:14 AM PST by Join Or Die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

OK, you are obviously off your meds or just an out and out racist. Now I AM deliberately using that word. I never realized that a US Senator, who was born in the US, whose father and mother were born in the US, who happens to have ancestors who came from Lebanon was one of those Ay-rabs who wanted us dead. I also never realized that my godfather, who was born in this country and served in the Air Force during the Korean War was one of those Ay-rabs who wanted us dead either.
So, tell me, is it hard to see the key pad with your white sheet over your head?


35 posted on 12/16/2005 11:28:45 AM PST by go-dubya-04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Seems NYC needs to be hit again to make a point.


36 posted on 12/16/2005 11:30:10 AM PST by verity (The MSM is a National disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: standing united
I'll have to second your outrage SU. Since when did we start *trusting* big government to do the right thing?!

I put my trust in 1994, not 1984.

37 posted on 12/16/2005 11:31:04 AM PST by mancogasuki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Also, you ignorant fool, both Sununu and my godfather are Maronites, which is a Christian sect associated with the Catholic Church and who were instrumental in fighting for Christianity during the Crusades. Learn some history before you make a bigger fool out yourself than you already have, though that would be pretty hard to do.


38 posted on 12/16/2005 11:34:58 AM PST by go-dubya-04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
"Can you imagine what this country would be like if President Hillary had the power to order the FBI to make warrantless searches on whoever she wanted?"

Just a thought but do you think that there has been a modern president (other than Carter and he doensn't count) that hasn't had black bag ops doing warrantless searches on whoever they wanted, law or no law?

I don't think I'm a black helicopter type and I don't have any facts to back me up but my gut tells me that this has been going on since Truman to one extent or another, either through the FBI or the NSA.

39 posted on 12/16/2005 11:39:34 AM PST by Proud_texan ("Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman; TexasCajun

I'm wasting my time, you won't read a word,but here's some.


Start with Phyllis Schlafly's summary.
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

Here's Cornyn's Shamnesty Bill
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/?&Db=d108&querybd=@FIELD(FLD003+@4((@1(Sen+Cornyn++John))+01692))


10. S.1387 : A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize the establishment of guest worker programs, to provide for the adjustment of status of certain aliens unlawfully present in the United States to the status of a non-immigrant guest worker, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 7/10/2003) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Judiciary

Same link, down the page is Cornyn's bill to make you pay for all of Mexico.

27. S.2941 : A bill to authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 10/7/2004) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Foreign Relations

Senate Bill 2941.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2941:

Highlights:

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

The purposes of the Fund shall be--

(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;

(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and

(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States. (Reduce the wealth gap, how socialist)

More:

SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.

(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--

(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade between Mexico and Canada, and Mexico and the United States;

(2) to develop and implement post-secondary education programs in Mexico;

(3) to install telecommunications technologies throughout Mexico; and

(4) to construct other infrastructure that will carry out such purposes.

More:

SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.

(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.



Look up Robert Pastor to see the kind of company your heroes keep.

http://www.cfr.org/publication/8173/north_american_community_approach_to_security.html

Here's the main page.

http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=8138

Bon apetite.


40 posted on 12/16/2005 11:52:33 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ("It's time for a f****** war, so join the army of hardcore")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson