You assign a name to the intelligent designer and specify its activity in jest. As such you really do not contribute to the discussion, much as those who posit the spaghetti monter theory as some kind of serious refutation of, or analogical equivalence to, the theory of intelligent design.
Such things are designed to trigger a realization in the extremely dense of exactly how absurd their ID arguments are by showing them exactly ID, but with a different supernatural entity attached. It also serves to expose those who say ID isn't about religion, but about the concept of design. You know they're just creationists in scientist clothing if they reject Flying Spaghetti Monsterism but accept ID.
If such grade-school level, in-your-face examples don't work on the extremely dense, then there is simply no hope of their comprehension.
"As such you really do not contribute to the discussion, much as those who posit the spaghetti monter theory as some kind of serious refutation of, or analogical equivalence to, the theory of intelligent design."
It is not "analogically equivalent" (whatever that's supposed to mean). It's directly equivalent.
Fester, go chug a brew...it'll be a more meaningful use of your time.