Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
As if the theory of intelligent design could not possibly cite a specific intelligent agent! It is actually capable of more specificity than the theory of evolution. It posits a single, almighty, intelligent agent, not vague "forces of nature;" not a concoction of natural selection, random mutations, unguided forces, etc.

Behe denied this. Under oath.

677 posted on 12/13/2005 12:24:18 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
Behe denied this. Under oath.

That's his prerogative. He may actually mean what he says, and he may be right. But I'm curious as to the nature of the oath he swore in the first place. Do you have a copy of the oath he took? Maybe we could take a look at it.

687 posted on 12/13/2005 12:45:02 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson