[Tulsa Ramjet]

I'm so glad everyone in our government and the rest of the world is giving so much in-depth commentary and journalistic energy on how and when iran is going to have nuclear weapons, how the russians are selling the missiles so that iran can deliver them, and how the media accurately report how the leader of iran said israel needs to be wiped of the middle eastern map, or moved to europe. All these watchful audiences should be applauded in their perspectives, given a medal, then condemned to hell for their malfeasance of humanity.

Oh, and make sure the Kofi has a good time at the Palestinian UN dinner which showed the state of israel gone of the map.

[FEARED MUTATION]

If it wouldn't be so incredibly tragic I would almost like to let the Dems have their way - a nuclear Iran that naturally nukes Israel, who in return nuke every major city in Iran and every major capital in the Near East. Then we could say - Told you so!

Criminy, the defeat-America crowd is going to give me another heart attack. Because, of course, we can't allow this, but I wouldn't be surprised if our strike costs us the '06 and '08 elections. Which as horrible as that would be, would of course still be far preferable to a nuclear holocaust.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

"...even UN sanctions..." Wow!

[HHKrepublican_2]

U.N. sanctions may not deter the aggressive government in Tehran


Who wudda thunk it!

[My2Cents]

Dittos. And if I hear another Bush Administration official warn Syria that our patience is running out, I think my head will explode. Iraq is a "quagmire" only in the sense that our involvement there, and the noise the MSM and the left have made over our involvement there, seems to have taken the starch out of the President's shorts in regard to facing down real threats.

[Tim Long]

On a similar note (EMP threat):

http://www.hallindseyoracle.com/articles.asp?ArticleID=12171

[Frank_Discussion]

Hey, Iran really needs to join the modern world - OUTSOURCING. We deliver.

[Williams]

Let's apply logic. The worst alleged "lie" going into Iraq was that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons. BECAUSE nuclear weapons are conceded as the one true slam dunk reason to go in.

Logical extension means we all must support military action to prevent a nuclear Iran. This should have been the debate all along, and it is the thing the leftists have been trying to prevent ever since 9-11.

Go back and read early comments by the likes of Clarke and Biden - they were obsessed that we not "repeat our mistake" by "threatening" Syria and Iran.

[tomahawk]

And if it happens on Pres. Bush's watch, he is a total and abject failure.

Those nukes will be in Al Qaeda's hands in a matter of years.

[billhilly]

Maybe their first bomb will blow up in the garage.

[TheDon]

You can kiss Tel Aviv and New York City goodbye!