To: TigerLikesRooster; neverdem; SunkenCiv; blam
To: TigerLikesRooster
Is it possibly to truly "change history" as the headline states?
3 posted on
12/08/2005 4:08:07 AM PST by
AndrewB
To: TigerLikesRooster
I guess we can't blame this on global warming or Bush. Never mind, the dems will think of something around that.
4 posted on
12/08/2005 4:09:08 AM PST by
hershey
To: TigerLikesRooster
The supposed sudden disappearance of the Saraswati river in ancient India, and not the Aryan influx, is thought to have led to the demise of the Indus Valley Civilisation.
5 posted on
12/08/2005 4:09:54 AM PST by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
"So it must have had a major impact, not just on humans but on all species in equatorial Africa at this time." I guess this is why you see so many Wildebeast in American, they all migrated out of Africa because if this drought, right? Changing history isn't possible unless you are a Democrat or a communist. History is what it is, the drought happened therefore it is the history of that time.
6 posted on
12/08/2005 4:29:10 AM PST by
calex59
(Seeing the light shouldn't make you blind...)
To: TigerLikesRooster
If history only goes back about 5000 years, what history was there to change?
8 posted on
12/08/2005 4:54:55 AM PST by
shekkian
To: TigerLikesRooster
It 'changed' nothing.
It CREATED 'history'; just like a flood did as resently as 3 months ago in NO!!!!
12 posted on
12/08/2005 5:58:54 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This was covered pretty well in a PBS documentary (Nova, I think) that focussed on the back-tracking of human history via the Y chromosome. However, IIRC, they felt the drought, due to an Ice Age, was comewhat more recent than 70,000 years.
13 posted on
12/08/2005 7:27:10 AM PST by
expatpat
To: TigerLikesRooster; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
15 posted on
12/08/2005 9:50:29 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
16 posted on
12/08/2005 9:51:59 AM PST by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Sounds like the pre-historic Africans overused their SUV's and triggered a global warming crisis. Too bad they didn't have a written language. They didn't know all they had to do was sign a treaty and all would be well.
18 posted on
12/08/2005 10:16:44 AM PST by
colorado tanker
(I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
To: TigerLikesRooster
22 posted on
12/08/2005 12:37:43 PM PST by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
25 posted on
12/08/2005 12:53:07 PM PST by
VOA
To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm a proud member of Haplogroup G2
26 posted on
12/08/2005 12:53:48 PM PST by
add925
To: PatrickHenry
Maybe worth a look.
35 posted on
12/08/2005 6:52:22 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It shows equatorial Africa experienced a prolonged period of drought.Al Gore just called. Turns out it was Global Warming that caused this. As the inventor off the internet, Al proclaims that this was a precursor event to show how bad things could get...
Unfortunately the oral history of the local inhabitants failed to carry the message accurately to the present day.(/sarc)
40 posted on
12/09/2005 5:53:59 AM PST by
Cliff Dweller
("get thar fustest with the mostest." GEN NB Forrest)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson