To: caffe
One could go on and on and on about the ab surdity of this THEORY,
You can always tell when a creationist lacks a fundamental understanding of science when they emphasize the word "theory". They only emphasize the word because they don't understand what a "theory" is in the context of science.
141 posted on
12/07/2005 12:50:56 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
You can always tell when a creationist lacks a fundamental understanding of science When? WHEN? According so some of the pro-evo folks on the threads, all creationists lack a fundamental understanding of science anyway. /sarcastic exaggeration>
Full Disclosure: ...and if they do, why are they called "fundies" anway?
268 posted on
12/07/2005 6:32:51 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Dimensio
Exactly. Evolution is a mere hypothesis, a failed one that should be discarded and regulated to the ash heap of history.
891 posted on
12/10/2005 2:04:33 PM PST by
streetpreacher
(If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson