Posted on 12/07/2005 2:57:52 AM PST by beaversmom
Joe was family to Cindy Gaffney, and the Marengo woman says the Great Dane's March 2004 death devastated her.
What compounded her grief was the feelings of "guilt that she had betrayed Joe, as well as frustration and helplessness because she could not provide relief for Joe's pain," according to a lawsuit Gaffney's attorney filed this week.
The five-count suit seeks in excess of $50,000 per count from Dundee Animal Hospital in East Dundee, and one of its veterinarians, Dr. Leonid Gurevich. According to the suit, Gurevich's actions "led to the untimely death of Joe Gaffney, a canine member" of her family.
Gaffney's attorney, Amy A. Breyer, said the lawsuit focuses on the animal hospital billing itself as a 24-hour emergency facility that could provide specialized care.
Gaffney, a former volunteer with the hospital's Helping Paws organization that rescues Great Danes, said she chose the facility because it was supposed to provide that round-the-clock emergency care.
"When it came down to it, the doctor made a death decision for this dog rather than provide 24-hour emergency care," said Breyer, whose Chicago practice is the first in Illinois to focus on animal law.
Debra James, the hospital's practice administrator, declined comment on the lawsuit. The hospital's attorneys could not be reached for comment.
Gaffney said she awoke early on March 3 to the sounds of her 9-year-old dog making retching sounds. She contacted the Dundee Animal Hospital and took him into the facility. Gurevich diagnosed Joe with bloat, she said. Bloat is a condition that affects large animals in which the stomach twists and causes pain. It can be fatal without surgery.
However, Gurevich did not recommend surgery, based on Joe's medical history. The Great Dane had a leg amputated earlier that year and had been undergoing chemotherapy for cancer, she said.
According to the lawsuit, the veterinarian refused to perform the surgery. He gave Gaffney, who wanted Joe to have the surgery, the names of several other hospitals that could perform the procedure but acknowledged Joe could die en route. Gurevich did not give Joe any pain medication or fluids, the lawsuit states.
Joe later was taken to a Woodstock animal hospital where he died undergoing surgery.
The lawsuit states that as a result of Joe's death, Gaffney suffered "great mental anguish, including: crying, nausea, headaches, shaking, loss of sleep, loss of appetite, nightmares, daytime nightmarish thoughts, anxiety, anger (and) sadness ..."
A Feb. 27 hearing is scheduled on the lawsuit.
Breyer said animal law is a fairly new field and includes veterinary malpractice and animal research issues. She said her practice focuses on companion animals, or pets. She said there has been a movement toward using the word companion rather than pet.
"The hope is people will view these relationships more seriously," she said. "My personal feeling is over the course of U.S. history, companion animals have not been valued very highly in economic terms and the insurance industry takes advantage of that."
Insurance companies, which provide veterinary malpractice coverage, generally are not interested in settling cases, she said.
"The current strategy is they litigate until the individual plaintiff can't litigate anymore and goes away," Breyer said. "I have clients who understand it is a process and it takes awhile and will not be defeated by their war of attrition strategy." 12/02/05
Makes you wonder what kind of "relationship" dog and owner had.
Gotta love trial lawyers.
LOL--good question. I like dogs and cats as well as the next person, but this woman needs to get a life. I think most women like this that make their pets their babies are not married and don't have any children.
However, Gurevich did not recommend surgery, based on Joe's medical history. The Great Dane had a leg amputated earlier that year and had been undergoing chemotherapy for cancer, she said.
We already know this woman is a little bit toony for getting her dog chemo. I think there comes a time when we need to say goodbye to Fido. I know it's hard--I don't like doing it, but you can go overboard with an animal trying to prolong its life.
Three legs, one ear, one eye, neutered, goes by the name Lucky.
This won't go anywhere. I'm fairly certain that under the law a pet is considered property, so the maximum amount a plaintiff could sue for would be the value of the pet. A purebred greyhound can easily be obtained for under $1000, so the $50k lawsuit is bs.
The libs are trying to go from pets to companions. It won't be long before they are wanting to marry them.
Scummy trial lawyers, and idiotic dog lovers. What a combo...
Also, a 9 year old Great Dane is near his life expectancy – most die before they are 10.
Lucky to be alive!
The dogs owner should be charged with animal cruelty for making the one-legged, cancer infested animal go through so much pain and suffering just because SHE wanted it to live. That, is just downright mean IMHO.
But he’s one of the family! Think of the heartache! < /sarcasm>
I've heard that too about Great Danes/big dogs. If she had been thinking she could have grabbed some of his DNA and had him cloned.
It is heartbreaking to lose a beloved pet but lady, it's a DOG. The poor animal was going thru chemo, was missing a leg and now had a twisted gut. The vet should report the owner for cruelty to animals.
...or maybe there is a business out there where you can freeze animals like they do humans and he could have been brought back at a later time when they figure out how to increase a dog's longevity.
Bull Shi'ite!!!
The hope is, for this lawyer, to find a new way to make $$$!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.