Replies

The Dallas Morning News opinion page generally leads with a debate between a strident leftist and a mild-mannered centrist. Today, they put the debate on page 6 and led with this piece on immigration. The original source of the article is at http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_4_mexico.html

I haven't checked to see how the article changed.

Well, when President Bush's Ambassador to Mexico marries the Corona Beer Baroness A14; whose side do you think he is on?

If it was anyone else that was appointed - they would have been forced to resign when they married into money of the country they are ambassador to- big ethical conflict, and of course there are federal laws being broken.

Definitely not the side of US Taxpayers and Citizens.

No demands for reciprocity from Mexico - at all.
No demands for Mexico to clean house from corruption.
No demands for the security of US citizens on the border.
No demands for Mexico to become capitalist or change their socialist ways, so their citizens can improve their lives at home, instead of illegally coming here.

Pesos for the RNC and RINOS.

With all the money illegals send back to Mexico, if I were the Mexican government, I'd give each person, upon his 18th birthday:
- Forged Documents ( green card, matricular etc....)
- $5000.00 in seed money
- Instructions on how\where\when to cross.
then frog march 'em, en mass, to demarcation points.

the author is kidding and the mexican government has no desire to not continue breaking international law, American law, state and federal law of a soverign nation named America, but of course then there is our politicians. You guys remember them, the number 2 reason that there is more than 1 reason.

I forget the rest.....
besides when and if there is already a number 2, and remember just how bad and smelly that is............
and think about something worse, and then you realize there is more than this planet's share of number 1 going on and remember where you get your water......

Good luck to us all......

At some point there will have to be a lawsuit filed in the supreme court, due to the disenfranchised voters that will exist in the south west. All illegal immigrants will be given voting right is the US sooner or later, the way things are going, and they will also retain their citizenship to Mexico by design, so they will be allowed to vote in both US and Mexican elections.

Since, for all argument purposes, it is both the government of Mexico and the US in agreement (under the table) who are governing the citizens of the southwest. Therefore, the legal US citizen with no vote or say in the Mexican party, will be disenfranchised (and one could argue even now) .

Remember:

1776--- Taxation without representation! That was the battle cry of the 13 colonies in America who were forced to pay taxes to England's King George III with no representation

1962--- The Supreme Court ruled that the denial of equal representation (districts equal in population size) was a violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment