To: Doctor Raoul
I was thinking the same thing! If I had the option to pay for which news outlets I wanted to see, FoxNews would be it. I suspect THAT is the real reason they are upset over these changes. People will pay for porn. I don't expect the Playboy channel, HBO or Showtime to go under. Cinemax might have some trouble, but they show enough soft-core porn on weekends to stay afloat.
IMHO, the REAL nervous ninnies are the news outlets and those "every-woman-is-a-victim" channels.
To: Littlejon
IMHO, the REAL nervous ninnies are the news outlets and those "every-woman-is-a-victim" channels.I always wondered why Lifetime was "television for women," when every time I flip throuh the darn channel, it's showing a woman getting the snot kicked out of her...
21 posted on
12/03/2005 7:07:11 AM PST by
Malacoda
(The Posting Police annoy me)
To: Littlejon
FoxNews would be it.
I would agree, except for their dang Alert Banner covering up much of the screen, especially during live events.
I do allot of screen caps and, many times, during those events, MSNBC and/or CNN screen are less cluttered with banners than FoxNews.
35 posted on
12/03/2005 7:22:20 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Littlejon
People will pay for porn. Yeah? Explain Air America...
146 posted on
12/03/2005 4:43:23 PM PST by
Doctor Raoul
(Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson