[little jeremiah]

Shut up, George. Since the majority of Americans (those of us outside the northest, who weren't educated in the Ivy League universities, and who don't live in DC) don't - believe - in - evolution.

I do hope you're reading this or one of your assistants reads it. Intelligent design is only provocative to liberals, atheists, leftists, and over educated elitists.

IT'S THE SPENDING AND LEFIST SUCKUP POSITIONS THAT ARE DOING THE DAMAGE.

[moog]

Agreed with your last sentence.

[LWalk18]

Shut up, George. Since the majority of Americans (those of us outside the northest, who weren't educated in the Ivy League universities, and who don't live in DC) don't - believe - in - evolution.

So science should be determined by polls. If a majority of Americans believed in astrology, should it be taught in schools as science?

[ThinkDifferent]

Since the majority of Americans (those of us outside the northest, who weren't educated in the Ivy League universities, and who don't live in DC) don't - believe - in - evolution.

That's nice, and completely irrelevant. A majority of Americans believe all sorts of things that aren't true.

[tortoise]

Intelligent design is only provocative to liberals, atheists, leftists, and over educated elitists.

You forgot to add "people who understand mathematics" to your list.

[NewLand]

Intelligent design is only provocative to liberals, atheists, leftists, and over educated elitists.

And some of those you describe are right here on FR, posing as conservatives...