Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Zap Illegals, Jail Those Who Hire Them
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 11/30.05 | Cynthia Tucker

Posted on 11/30/2005 8:40:01 AM PST by epow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
Finally, Cynthia Tucker wrote something I can mostly agree with. The first, and probably the last, time that has ever happened. The part I agree with is that if there were no jobs available for illegal immigrants there would be little reason for Mexicans to come here here illegally.

The part of her article I disagree with is where she says that Americans won't work at menial jobs for the money that employers will pay. I believe that Americans would work those jobs if the welfare system was cut back to only provide benefits to the truly disabled or otherwise unemployable poor. Hunger creates a powerful motivation to get a job.

1 posted on 11/30/2005 8:40:04 AM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: epow

Ive always felt that for a first offense there should be a fine that hurts but doesn't put them out of business. A second offense should bring jail.


2 posted on 11/30/2005 8:41:53 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I've always thought that the day a McDonalds is raided, the owners and managers jailed, and the establishment sold at public auction to the loss of the finance company, there would be a mass panick to fire all the illegals.



3 posted on 11/30/2005 8:45:13 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

Cynthia Tucker wrote this? Cynthia Tucker is opposed to illegal immigration?

Is it possible that a little common sense has oozed in through the cracks at the AJC?


4 posted on 11/30/2005 8:45:17 AM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

LOL somehow I suspect that would work like a charm.


5 posted on 11/30/2005 8:46:37 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: epow

{The part I agree with is that if there were no jobs available for illegal immigrants there would be little reason for Mexicans to come here here illegally.}

Not so fast. While there are a few businesses that intentionally exploit illegal workers, most are honest but helpless to stop it. For example, when we hire construction laborers, if they provide proof of identity and a SS#, we cannot deny them employment based on their legal status. Further, it is illegal to investigate the authenticity of the documentation they present. A company would have to start a policy of background checks on all employees to stop it. Some already do. But it is cost prohibitive to do background checks in industries where profits are tight, risk is high and wages are low.


6 posted on 11/30/2005 8:46:45 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Dems: "It can't be done" Reps. "Move, we'll find a way or make a way. It has to be done!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"Ive always felt that for a first offense there should be a fine that hurts but doesn't put them out of business. A second offense should bring jail."

Amen


7 posted on 11/30/2005 8:47:54 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

It should be made a felony for Criminals who overstay their legal visas and Invaders.

I believe we should give amnesty to these poor CRIMINALS or INVADERS.
This should be a 2 week amnesty to get the heck out of our Country.
The ones who ignore this amnesty should be buried in a tent city jail and fined $10,000 or buried elsewhere.
All aiders and abettors of these CRIMINALS or INVADERS should get 1 year in a tent city jail and a $10,000 fine for each CRIMINAL aided.
Those in government of Cities should be the first ones charged.


8 posted on 11/30/2005 8:48:17 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rush agrees with me 98.5% of the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
Some congresscritter was sponsering a bill, to in effect allow the IRS to nullify the tax deduction for all payroll for illegals, including the FICA, the Income tax, and Med payments on the 941. In addition, to penalize the employer with a per cent penalty.

If passed, this will take most of the wind out of the sails of those employers who hire illegals, as the "savings" via hiring same would be far less than the outlay when found out.

9 posted on 11/30/2005 8:48:41 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
re :Hunger creates a powerful motivation to get a job.

But while not paying executive wages they could pay a livable wage, these are fellow citizens we are talking about.

Can a lot of this work not be automated that way we don't need immigrants or a zombfied underclass who we keep around to do these jobs, but wont rebel because they are working for non livable wages.

10 posted on 11/30/2005 8:48:45 AM PST by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

There's another thing that has to happen and that is for the various states to deny the social services to illegals. When I hear the caterwauling about how much it would cost to round up and deport illegals, no mention is ever made of the billions it is costing us NOT to do it. Tucker has it half right here as far as employers go, but, not surprisingly, fails to address the issues of health care, education, incarceration, etc. which taxpayers are being forced to provide.

Since the feds won't fulfill their obligation to control the borders, maybe each state should be able to set its own policy and give local control over spending on illegals.


11 posted on 11/30/2005 8:50:15 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

Well, yes and no.

First of all, I used to manage a vineyard; when these guys come for employment, if they have the paper work, you MUST accept them. I certain most were illegal, but for me to turn them away would be a discrimitory act on my part, one that is punishable by both the EDD and in civil court. Furthermore, why must I be the enforcing agency of the Fed's laws? I have no training (nor should I) to identify forged documents, or any reasonable means to determine someone's citizenry. I have enough to do with tax compliance, EPA requirements, Fish and Game, county ordinance issues, air quality control, CDF, CHP code enforcements, and a myriad of other things that keep me full-time amusing the government; I don't wish to be the border police too.

Don't get me wrong; I'm not in favor of employing illegals, but why burden legitimate businesses with more?


12 posted on 11/30/2005 8:50:21 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

The added benifit would be to eliminate their high priced garbage from the market place!!

Their hamburgers were horible when they were 13 cents each or $1/doz. and considering the price aren't any better today.


13 posted on 11/30/2005 8:51:10 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Cynthia Tucker is opposed to illegal immigration?

I doubt it. She opposes Bush, and the main message of this slick piece is that not much is going to get done about those who illegally employ illegal aliens.

Personally, I think cutting ALL forms of assistance to deadbeats would bring actual Americans back to these entry-level jobs pretty quick.


14 posted on 11/30/2005 8:54:48 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

I guess salt is expensive. ;>


15 posted on 11/30/2005 8:55:02 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: epow
...disaffected Republican constituency that is increasingly hostile to immigrants — especially to those Latinos who enter the country illegally.

Fixed it. What kind of crap was this?

16 posted on 11/30/2005 8:55:58 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
...the president didn't spend too much time talking about the valuable contributions that immigrants have made or about granting them the opportunity to become citizens.

That's because the topic was ILLEGAL ALIENS.

Instead, Bush focused on fences and raids and deportations. In so doing, he reached out to a disaffected Republican constituency that is increasingly hostile to immigrants illegal aliens — especially to those Latinos who enter the country illegally.

Bush's tough talk will certainly have widespread appeal in Georgia, where many voters have become anxious — even angry — at what they perceive as the staggering burden of illegal immigration. There is a backlash brewing — a rising tide of frustration born of resentment over schools forced to accommodate non-English speakers, hospital emergency rooms beset by uninsured patients and perceptions of higher crime rates.

Georgia, meet a couple of California's "perceived" criminals.

Man Accused of Shooting CHP Officer Is Captured

Jaime Zavala Garcia, 37, was arrested in Liberal, Kan., on Sunday afternoon with his brother, Antonio Garcia Zavala of Hesperia, who was booked on a "perceived" suspicion of aiding and harboring a fugitive.

CHP Assistant Chief Mike Maples said Garcia was a "perceived" illegal Mexican immigrant whose Pontiac was to be impounded because he was a "perceived" unlicensed driver.

Garcia could face charges of "perceived" premeditated attempted murder of a police officer, and discharging a "perceived" firearm against a police officer — counts that could lead to a sentence of 40 years to life in prison if he is convicted.


17 posted on 11/30/2005 8:59:48 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
Is it possible that a little common sense has oozed in through the cracks at the AJC?

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile.

BUT, read the article closely.... perceptions of higher crime rates ....(the president) gave the usual lip service to the idea of responsible hiring

Typical Lib hit piece attacking corporations and the president. She and I may agree on her points, but for entirely different reasons.

18 posted on 11/30/2005 9:00:01 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

There is a way to double check the SSN and name to make sure they match, and you can check other immigration documents against other fed info.
It's a federal database, now optional for employers (I forget the name offhand). It shouldn't be.


19 posted on 11/30/2005 9:01:20 AM PST by bordergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: epow
While many industries claim they can't find willing American workers, the truth is that they could find more Americans willing to do tough, dirty jobs if they paid more for their labor.

They do not like to pay the market wage, they want government subsidy in form of future citizienship for the aliens and their relatives. The perspective of moving to US is a powerful incentive - the immigrants might be willing to work even at the LOSS!

20 posted on 11/30/2005 9:04:22 AM PST by A. Pole (Mandarin Meng-tzu: "The duty of the ruler is to ensure the prosperous livelihood of his subjects.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson