False.
It is currently based on guesswork and opinions, and even the criteria for the dating methods they use are based on opinion.
False.
Yet, they treat their theory like an actual belief system.
Actually, they treat it as extremely well-established science, supported by an overwhelming volume of evidence along multiply independent cross-confirming lines of evidence, because it is.
If you dated the Darwinists according to the sediment on their brains they'd all be a million years old.
Goofy ad hominem, at a playground level of sophistication.
I'd give your post a "D".
Go hit a library and try again later.
The typical arrogance of a Darwinist, swimming in so much pride and delusion that he fancifully gives grades to the rest of the world for their inadequate attempts.
The pride of the Darwinist is what prevents him from seeing the lies that glue together the pieces of 'evolution', and give him the delusion that the missing fossils are found and that his age-divining gadgets are faultless.