[Southack]

"And yet, ID is not necessary to explain bias, as you admit by dancing past Dissipative Structures, repeatedly. Therefore, it is NOT falsifiable."

Incorrect again.

Yawn. You really *are* boring me. First, ID doesn't have to explain all bias. This is because bias is a prerequisite (you need to look this word up, by the way) for ID, but ID is not a prerequisite for bias.

Second, ID *is* falsifiable. If there is no bias, then there can be no ID...this applies at every level. Test for bias. No bias found with a valid test? OK, then ID can't explain the Origin in question.

Furthermore, ID *is* responsible for modern genetic engineering. This means that anyone who claims that ID is "unfalsifiable" or "untestable" or "unscientific" is dissing an entire field of science (while simultaneously looking like an uneducated poster).

[voltaires_zit]

> If there is no bias, then there can be no ID...this
> applies at every level. Test for bias. No bias found with
> a valid test? OK, then ID can't explain the Origin in
> question.

And if there IS bias, hey, it doesn't necessarily mean ID.

Lovely.

NOT falsifiable.

NOT valid.

NOT science.

But lovely.

Keep dancing on the head of the pin.