So what? The test for every theory is its explanatory and predictive powers, not its relationship with any theology. So far, Darwinism successfully supported the development of major fields [biology, medicine, biotech industry]. These developments [like genetic manipulation, for example] continue, for Darwinism is working there.
In which opinion, you are in complete agreement with the author of the article. Note that Mr Neumeyr nowhere claims that Darwinism is false. He adduces no evidence whatsoever against it, cites no references that dispute Darwinism, and of course offers no alternative scientific explanation in its place.
The article is complete, 100% mudslinging and slander. It is sad that so many Christian opponents of Darwinism adopt this tactic, because it can only repel people uncertain of their faith. And if they then read Darwin, and experience his own unfailing courtesy and politeness, the contrast is telling.
Darwinism works for evolving animals, but not for a sinful humankind which is becoming stupider. Man does not survive through fit but through politics meant to undermine perceptions of such fitness. Evolution works towards a single limit between man and animals. Animals tend up to it, men tend down to it in convergence. Soddomite bestiality is an interesting metaphore of this phenomena. The error of Bible believers in this debate is that the Bible spends only a few words on creation, and not on mankind's self destruction, one which is valid. Until Darwinists realize that Darwinism is not meant to approve Marx's false ideal of the perfectibility of man, then we're doomed as a race. Only idiots believe in perfectibility of man through natural selection anarchy.