In which opinion, you are in complete agreement with the author of the article. Note that Mr Neumeyr nowhere claims that Darwinism is false. He adduces no evidence whatsoever against it, cites no references that dispute Darwinism, and of course offers no alternative scientific explanation in its place.
The article is complete, 100% mudslinging and slander. It is sad that so many Christian opponents of Darwinism adopt this tactic, because it can only repel people uncertain of their faith. And if they then read Darwin, and experience his own unfailing courtesy and politeness, the contrast is telling.