[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Note how RunningWolf never actually offers a single bit of evidence against the theory of evolution."

That's because he is incapable of arguing on that level. He'll make wild accusations like the ChiComs are operating on the *tenets of darwinistic evolution*, but when asked, he will refuse to tell you just what those tenets are. He can't. All he can do is regurgitate the same thing over and over about the *Evo-cult* and the like. He has actually said the scientific status of the theory is irrelevant; it's the *implications* that matter, blah blah blah.

[RunningWolf]

You call it a wild accusation but the document is right there. Do you deny that? It is noted that both you have avoided addressing the ChiCom document.

You rant and scream and howl that there is no evidence, and then when it is brought you run away from it.

This term (tenets of darwinist evolutionism) was a term I have come up with after some study,(being new to this) I found however that there are sources on this subject.

I used the the term 'tenets of darwinistic evolutionism' (not tenets of darwinism) to describe how the ChiComs have adopted some of the ideas & philosophy of darwinist evolutionism and theory of evolution as a component of their agenda to eradicate religion and ensure the victory of marxist atheism.

Yes I have made a connection with the ChiComs, marxist atheism, and darwinistic evolutionism. Notice the order of the connection that I made (not vice versa), so later when most certainly one or more you will attempt to ofuscate what I wrote I can go back to this.

Do you deny the ChiComs have done this?

My base position is that I do not have to have a competing explanation to say that cosmo & evo are weak on their own, and fail with a close look.

Also that does not mean I devalue or reject science, or demean its contributions. It is when the 'scientists' insist a vision of reality that is far beyond what they legitimately can with their 'science'

Wolf