Replies

You call it a wild accusation but the document is right there. Do you deny that? It is noted that both you have avoided addressing the ChiCom document.

You rant and scream and howl that there is no evidence, and then when it is brought you run away from it.

This term (tenets of darwinist evolutionism) was a term I have come up with after some study,(being new to this) I found however that there are sources on this subject.

I used the the term 'tenets of darwinistic evolutionism' (not tenets of darwinism) to describe how the ChiComs have adopted some of the ideas & philosophy of darwinist evolutionism and theory of evolution as a component of their agenda to eradicate religion and ensure the victory of marxist atheism.

Yes I have made a connection with the ChiComs, marxist atheism, and darwinistic evolutionism. Notice the order of the connection that I made (not vice versa), so later when most certainly one or more you will attempt to ofuscate what I wrote I can go back to this.

Do you deny the ChiComs have done this?

My base position is that I do not have to have a competing explanation to say that cosmo & evo are weak on their own, and fail with a close look.

Also that does not mean I devalue or reject science, or demean its contributions. It is when the 'scientists' insist a vision of reality that is far beyond what they legitimately can with their 'science'

Wolf

"This term (tenets of darwinist evolutionism) was a term I have come up with after some study,(being new to this) I found however that there are sources on this subject."

You still haven't defined what these tenets are.

"My base position is that I do not have to have a competing explanation to say that cosmo & evo are weak on their own, and fail with a close look."

In other words, you don't need to address any of the science itself, as you don't know a damn thing about either theory. But you feel it necessary to rant against theories you can't even describe. Typical.

Do you deny the ChiComs have done this?

Do you deny that Stalin and his Communist regime rejected Darwin?

You do make a good point, though. If the Chinese Communists can abuse evolution to advance their dangerous doctrine, it is all the more reason we should be vehement about making sure that American students get a proper, thorough education in the real facts about evolution so they can't be victimized by the false ideology of Communism. Ignorance is not bliss.