To: boulderite20
I know that. That's what makes it so undependable.
31 posted on
11/17/2005 4:43:57 PM PST by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
I know that. That's what makes it so undependable.
No, it is just generational. If you went to high school in the 70s, grass was 40 million years old. In the 80s it was 50 million years old. Now it is 70 million years old. Graphing that trend, as all good scientists would, puts it at grass at 100 million years old about 2050.
To: mlc9852; boulderite20
I know that. That's what makes it so undependable. So one is more "dependable" to the extent that they refrain from revising their knowledge and understanding in light of the results of criticism and crucial tests?
I was going to say that this suggests a rather eccentric definition of "dependable," but from a creationist maybe not.
40 posted on
11/17/2005 5:05:16 PM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: mlc9852
"I know that. That's what makes it so undependable."So when the bird flu shots become available, you won't have one because undependable science developed them?
56 posted on
11/17/2005 5:45:01 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson