Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BABY-IN-TRASH HORROR (Anything Goes, me-first culture bites back)
NY POST ^ | 11/16/05 | LAURA ITALIANO

Posted on 11/16/2005 6:26:04 AM PST by Liz

It's a crime both horrific and crass — a welfare mother smothers her crying baby in his crib, dumps him in a trash bin, then continues to collect public assistance on him for the next 4 1/2 years.

That's the case that was laid out in Manhattan Supreme Court yesterday against Diatra Hester-Bey, charged killing 14-month-old Devon Rivers on Feb. 29, 2000. "She smothered his face in a pillow, and then left him for dead as she took a nap," in the West 41st Street Red Cross shelter where they lived, Assistant DA Andrew Seewald told jurors.

Later, she dressed the baby's corpse and took it in a carriage, by subway, to Queens, where she tossed it away like garbage.......

The body has never been found. She continued to collect welfare checks on Devon's behalf — just over $100 a month — and has been charged with manslaughter and grand larceny.

Hester-Bey, of Brownsville, Brooklyn, was only arrested after an August 2004 fight with a boyfriend, Robert Potter.....ratted Hester-Bey out on the alleged smothering.

Hester-Bey first told cops that the baby died in his crib, and that she abandoned his corpse, still in the stroller, in Queens. After some two days of questioning, Hester-Bey tearfully admitted to the smothering.............

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: AD from SpringBay

The "mother" should be executed. It's the right thing to do. And until murderers are executed, justice will not be seen in this country.


81 posted on 11/16/2005 10:54:55 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Exactly.


82 posted on 11/16/2005 11:01:54 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He's done more for our country than we will ever know. He's the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hattori_Hanzo

She was "shacked up" with Russell Yates, who kept the secret of how totally deranged she was (she had, among other things, carved the numbers 666 into her scalp), while he left her home with all those little children every day, while he went off to work like nothing was wrong. And within a very few months of the murders, the still legally married Russell was attending the "singles group" at his church. Andrea clearly had an organic mental disorder, but Russell is IMO in the same ethical/moral basket as this woman who smothered her baby and tossed it in the trash.


83 posted on 11/16/2005 12:13:20 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Leofl

I would have put Andrea in a mental hospital (permanently) and Rusty in the ground.


84 posted on 11/16/2005 12:15:00 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I would have hung both of them. I don't believe that "post partum depression" is an excuse.


85 posted on 11/16/2005 12:18:42 PM PST by Clemenza (Ticking Away the Moments that Make up the Dog Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I wish this mother from hell would get the max.


86 posted on 11/16/2005 12:19:50 PM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Lucky abortion is freely available. It's supposed to stop things like this from happening, you know.


87 posted on 11/16/2005 12:21:03 PM PST by HitmanLV (Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Gee, I better make a note of that.

Nice of the pro-aborts to take care of it (/sarc).


88 posted on 11/16/2005 12:50:29 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

Probably will get off with a "warning."

Authroities should determine if there was another circumstance that impelled the killing.

Did she have a new boyfriend who thought the baby was in the way, ala Susan Smith?


89 posted on 11/16/2005 12:53:51 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

What Andrea Yates had went well beyond "post-partum depression". She had been diagnosed with post-partum psychosis, and i'd be surprised if she isn't also diagnosed schizophrenic by now. She had also been prescribed some powerful anti-psychotic drugs, which IIRC she had stopped taking at some point prior to the murders. Some kinds of mental illness really make the sufferers unable to perceive reality. Andrea appears to have had such a mental illness. Russell, on the other hand, was apparently fully functional in that he was performing satisfactorily in a full-time professional job. He simply failed to take the common sense actions in response to his wife's obvious complete insanity. Among other things, although she had had severe post-partum depression, and I believe also psychosis, after the next to last child, and doctors had warned the Yates against another pregnancy, he wasted no time in getting her pregnant again AND leaving her alone every day with the even larger group of young children.


90 posted on 11/16/2005 2:10:41 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

She/He seems harmless other that the stench of arrogance.

The race baiting is interesting, like fishing for confirmation of a groupthink thought with no hope of ever accepting the opposite reality... When the freeper calls, its a passionless submissive response meant to keep the heat off until another lure can be cast.

What a pathetic existance.


91 posted on 11/17/2005 4:58:38 AM PST by Eddie01 (I'm coming to the conclusion I'm really not smart enough to post here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01; little jeremiah; dennisw; SJackson

You know it is customary at FR to ping someone when you discuss them, particularly when you make an unsubstantiated charge, or attack, based on absolutely nothing, except maybe your own paranoia. Maybe you don't know the rules of the road.


92 posted on 11/17/2005 5:16:41 AM PST by veronica (What will "Ronnie" think? The question that obsesses the internut clowns...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I know the rules of the road. In this case, I ignored them for a reason.

Your rudeness.


93 posted on 11/17/2005 6:33:27 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson