Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod
That is a derivative argument and awful shaky ground to set up a prohibition. By that logic, one could ban cars because of the temptation to speed, especially for the young.

That's why it's paragraph #17 of a very solid natural law argument.

I'll ask you the same question. What Bible verse prohibits contraception?

Which Bible verse says that only evils that are explicitly stated in the Bible are truly evil?

Regardless, the sin of Onan is clear enough. At least it was to all Christians prior to 1929.

73 posted on 11/16/2005 7:49:13 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan

The sin of Onan was that he disobeyed God's command to procreate if memory serves. He spilled his seed on the ground to prevent procreation. It was not the act itself that was wrong, it was the intention behind the act. Trying to build a logical bridge between this and contreceptives is akin to trying to build that famous bridge to the 21st century.

Contraceptives are not intrinsically evil. I'm not buying your argument.


75 posted on 11/16/2005 8:11:47 AM PST by sauropod ("The love that dare not speak its' name has now become the love that won't shut the hell up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson