Pull the other leg now:
Furthermore, after the testimony in the recent Dover trial (from both the prosecution *and* the defense), andyone who tries to claim that ID isn't just a trojan horse for creationism clearly hasn't been keeping track.
Pull the other leg now:
Furthermore, after the testimony in the recent Dover trial (from both the prosecution *and* the defense), andyone who tries to claim that ID isn't just a trojan horse for creationism clearly hasn't been keeping track.
I see book covers, but I don't know what's inside, so I have no idea if they mention creationism or not.
"Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools."
That you present that as damning evidence would seem to indicate that you are now conflating belief in the existence of God with young-Earth, seven-day creationism.
Unless your real objection is not to creationism per se, but to according credibility to belief in God.