To: Drawsing
"I think its "before the common era" and "common era". It is an attempt to remove "Christ" as a pivotal historical event. The most "sophisticated" archaeologists always use this device don't ya know."
They claim that this method is used due to a flaw in the dating of the BC system.
Archaeologists claim that this system does not account for a few years, and that by adjusting the BC dating system Christ would actually have been born in 4 BC.
So, 4 BC is thought to be 1 CE.
All of that may be true, but they sure go all the way when it comes to ignoring Christ.
29 posted on
11/10/2005 6:12:09 AM PST by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Preachin'
Nope. The years are identical. CE and BCE were simply used to replace BC and AD because they were too Christian-centric. No other reason than that.
This isn't 2005 AD and 2009 CE.
69 posted on
11/10/2005 11:11:03 AM PST by
frgoff
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson