Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Obama Warns TV to Clean Up or Congress Will Act
TVWeek ^ | 11/09/05 | Doug Halonen

Posted on 11/09/2005 5:36:21 PM PST by Pikamax

Sen. Obama Warns TV to Clean Up or Congress Will Act By Doug Halonen

If the industry doesn't take significant steps to make it easier for parents to control what their children view on television, Congress will step in and legislate. That was a warning shot fired by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in a speech Wednesday in Washington.

Story continues below...

"The amount of questionable content spilling across our screens is growing by the year," Sen. Obama said at a press conference to release a new study by the Kaiser Family Foundation that says the number of sex scenes on TV has been increasing dramatically over the past several years.

"Once again, we find ourselves asking those in charge to serve the needs of a nation that has a higher calling than simply peddling indecency and materialism for profit," the senator said.

The study, which examined a representative example of broadcast and cable TV network shows, said that 70 percent of programs included some sexual content this year (with an average of five sex scenes per hour), while only 56 percent did so in 1998 (with 3.2 sex scenes per hour). Among shows that had sexual content, the study said, 14 percent this year included a reference to sexual risks or responsibilities, up from 9 percent in 1998.

But Sen. Obama said he is particularly concerned about the impact television is having on the ability of parents to instill positive values in their children. "Raising your children this way has become exceedingly difficult in a mass media culture that saturates our airwaves with a steady stream of sex, violence and materialism," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; hillarysveep; nannystate; obama; osamaobama; posturingfake; thegreatdemhope; trashtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-254 next last
To: mlc9852
Sweetie, you're the one who doesn't recognize sarcasm when you see it. /SARCASM!!!!
181 posted on 11/09/2005 7:20:55 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I understand but they're not young children. When they were small children the airwaves weren't as bad as they are now. The last few years have been crazy. Have you had to explain to an 10 year old what Viagra is because the commercial was on during a football game? Or have you had to quickly change the channel because your 13 year old saw 2 boys (yes, boys!) kissing on a program geared toward teens? This garbage wasn't on tv even 10 years ago.


"No, re-read the ages. I've just recently sent my kids out into the world."


182 posted on 11/09/2005 7:24:01 PM PST by At a Later Date
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Oh my goodness! Your "middle one" is a lovely lady and not the young man I expected her to be. My face is red! The prayers and thoughts go out the same, and a double thank you to her and to you for raising a beautiful daughter. (Your home page is great!)


183 posted on 11/09/2005 7:24:42 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I agree with him also but I don't think he REALLY believes his own rhetoric.He's trying to pander to the anti-smut segment of the electorate.
Just don't trust the Dems to do anything from principle.


184 posted on 11/09/2005 7:25:22 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: At a Later Date

Again...that's why you should just toss out the TV. That simple.


185 posted on 11/09/2005 7:26:37 PM PST by wedwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: At a Later Date

"When they were small children the airwaves weren't as bad as they are now."

Yes, they were. There was smut all over. It was hard explaining to your pre-teen why they can't watch friends when all their classmates were.


186 posted on 11/09/2005 7:28:28 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: asp1

Thanks, we did alright with her. And we monitored her tv watching.


187 posted on 11/09/2005 7:29:41 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: asp1

I don't think you know me well enough to call me Sweetie.


188 posted on 11/09/2005 7:30:00 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Yes, you did.


189 posted on 11/09/2005 7:31:31 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: asp1

Us either. They knew what they were allowed to watch and not to watch. Just because it is on the air doesn't mean you have to watch it. Use the remote. Tell the kids...that's it. This show is not for kids. They'll move on and do something else. Who's in charge at home anyway???


190 posted on 11/09/2005 7:34:25 PM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He's done more for our country than we will ever know. He's the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

You have had the last word. Let's call it a day, alright?


191 posted on 11/09/2005 7:35:29 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: asp1
"mad puppy, I think everyone agrees with you..

Wow! I've got to go get the wife, she won't believe this. LOL. And you know what, I don't want the gov't TELLING me what I'm allowed to watch either. As I read what Obama said:


"If the industry doesn't take significant steps to make it easier for parents to control what their children view on television..."

I guess I'm agreeing that it should be easier to stop the trash with out having to go to the extreme of throwing out my TV.

Thanks for the non-combative comment. I think we're in what a friend of my calls 'violent agreement'... but I still may fight on with Indy

Good night.
192 posted on 11/09/2005 7:36:15 PM PST by mad puppy ( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: wedwo

Getting rid of my tv would not really make a difference. I have nearly 200 channels blocked and I'm vigilant about what they watch. The problem is that this stuff is everywhere. Everywhere. In the mall, at friends' homes, in music, on billboards, on the covers of magazines on line at the supermarket... I can't seem to get away from it. It's gotten considerably worse these last few years. "Just turn if off" doesn't work anymore.


193 posted on 11/09/2005 7:39:10 PM PST by At a Later Date
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Oops. Looks like I made the same mistake. Shame on me! Your DAUGHTER is lovely and my prayers are with her for her safe return.


194 posted on 11/09/2005 7:40:53 PM PST by At a Later Date
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
When my children were each 15 I told them that they were not going to go Trick or Treating any longer. To me, after a certain age Trick or Treat can turn into trouble. Well, both kids grumbled a lot, but they stayed home. Next day at work one of my colleagues was telling of his 14 year old who was picked up by the police for vandalism and fighting. He asked me how I kept mine at home. I was stunned by the question. I asked him the same, "Who's in charge at your house?" LOL!
195 posted on 11/09/2005 7:46:13 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: At a Later Date

Thanks, their coming home date, after a year, is sometime in January. She's a good conservative girl, and her platoon mates are as well. She's in a great group, and we all should be proud of them. They are awesome, respectful, patriotic, and conservative.


196 posted on 11/09/2005 7:47:12 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

HeeHee! Good night, my FRiend.


197 posted on 11/09/2005 7:47:30 PM PST by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: At a Later Date

You are so right. It's pervasive and there doesn't seem to be much we can do about it.


198 posted on 11/09/2005 7:50:12 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Hey, pinging is required.

You can advocate all the big government intervention you want. I'll insist the ^#&*(&*($%&% government stay out of my business. So, let's agree that I'm right and you're wrong, problem solved! :)


199 posted on 11/09/2005 7:50:50 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I think Obama is on to something here, and something does need to be done. I may be attacked for saying this, because I am not a pure libertarian, but I think it is of the upmost importance that we do something about popular culture. Many conservative thinkers, like Robert Bork, have made well-reasoned arguments in favor of placing limits on the media. This is one issue where we might be able to work together and succeed in changing the future of America. If Republicans were wise they would jump on board.


200 posted on 11/09/2005 7:59:00 PM PST by dmc8576
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson