Posted on 11/04/2005 7:05:43 AM PST by pabianice
That's my take on it - Specter's trying to kill the nomination without getting his fingerprints all over the attempt. I don't think he'll be able to kill it that easily, though.
"The White House wanted [Judge Alito's confirmation] before Christmas," Mr. Specter said yesterday. "It just couldn't be done. We have to do it right; we can't do it fast."
It's going to go down like this:
"It just couldn't be done. Bumping up the confirmation hearings doesn't leave enough time for all of our Special Interest Groups to produce, fund & run Anti-Alito ads in all media outlets."
>The Dems want Sandra Day O'Connor around as long as possible. There must be some issues before the court that they want her to decide, not Alito.<
Bingo! Parental notification scheduled to be heard in early Dec. Specter and the Democrats want to delay this appointment.
O'Connor should have been replaced before Rehquist. She would have been off the court.
The right wanted a fight with a known conservative nominee. They did not trust George Bush to actually appoint a nominee that was consevative and confirmable.
So they blew her out of the water. The right can never again claim that all nominees deserve an up or down vote. Miers didn't get one. Only a very big idiot would believe Alito will get one.
Inasmuch as O'Connor resigned effective only on the confirmation of her replacement, not in this case.Unfortunately. Part of me wants that to happen - and have the president name Thomas Sowell to a vacancy. That would be "extrodinary circumstances" to the lefties; Ted Kennedy would have a seizure. But who more wise than Sowell, to cut to the heart of a matter to the principled result?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.