Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Playing it safe Hillary? The Leftists are not going to be happy with this. THEY WANT WAR!
1 posted on 11/01/2005 8:11:58 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: areafiftyone
...our most fundamental rights...

Newspeak for abortion. Why is abortion among "our" most fundamental rights?
31 posted on 11/01/2005 8:22:08 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"I intend to closely examine Judge Alito’s record and qualifications and carefully monitor the Judiciary Committee hearings in order to determine whether he intends to be a guardian of the rule of law who puts fairness and justice before ideology."

Shouldn't he be a guardian of the constitution Hillary? We don't need anyone in the judiciary who thinks they can make law in spite of it. We have enough liberal judges who do that already.

32 posted on 11/01/2005 8:22:54 AM PST by Forte Runningrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Big Italian vote in NY. Hillary better be careful. Her opponent is also Italian (at least by marriage).


33 posted on 11/01/2005 8:23:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
What we currently know about Judge Alito raises serious questions about whether he will be steadfast in protecting our most fundamental rights

People of Philadelphia, you can sleep tonight. It appears her spectacledness and democrat company have uncovered a closet Nazi on the bench of the 3rd Circuit Court.
35 posted on 11/01/2005 8:23:49 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"What we currently know about Judge Alito raises serious questions about whether he will be steadfast in protecting our most fundamental rights."

Translation.....We want the right to keep killing our babies Founding fathers turning over in their grave alert.

36 posted on 11/01/2005 8:27:30 AM PST by standingfirm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
...so that my colleagues and I can fully discharge our constitutional mandate of providing the President with meaningful 'advice and consent' on his nomination."

Just your consent,if you please,senator.The advice has been taken care of.

40 posted on 11/01/2005 8:29:04 AM PST by hschliemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I hope that both the President and Judge Alito will be forthcoming during this process

Oh, they'll be forthcoming, Hillary, don't you worry your little head about it. And, if they 'don't recall' answers to some of the questions, I just know you'll understand.

43 posted on 11/01/2005 8:34:08 AM PST by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Didn't get your "consensus" nominee, eh Hillary?

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


45 posted on 11/01/2005 8:34:45 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I intend to closely examine Judge Alito’s record and qualifications and carefully monitor the Judiciary Committee hearings in order to determine whether he intends to be a guardian of the rule of law who puts fairness and justice before ideology.

She asks if Judge Alito will be a guardian of the rule of law - puts fairness and justice before ideology - the LAW isn't about what is fair or ought to be - the LAW is how it is written period. Mrs. Clinton ought to be asked the same question as she is all about ideology and the THIRD WAY.....it just boggles the mind how stupid this woman thinks we are. Ms. Clinton has demonstrated many times what she thinks about law – the law rarely touches this empty pant suit that struts about impersonating a senator…………..when in fact she is in politics for the POWER.

47 posted on 11/01/2005 8:36:05 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Playing it safe Hillary? The Leftists are not going to be happy with this. THEY WANT WAR!

Pretending to play it safe. Advancing her newest persona as that of 'moderate'. Don't worry, lol, she's saving the war for later.

Perhaps we, the American people, "must initiate a thoughtful and deliberate process of closely examining and scrutinizing Judge Alito’s Sen. Clinton's record to determine whether he she merits a seat on the highest court in the nation in our nation's senate.

Such arrogance in her 'statement'. Could she pass the same test?

49 posted on 11/01/2005 8:42:44 AM PST by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Unsubstantive.

Fundamental right to what Hillary? Come on, tell the American people what you mean. ;-)

Seems Hillary wants to separate herself from the race baiting Chuckie Schumer. As well as avoid the "mob" connections the DNC is alledging. She's still voting no, we all are aware of it.


54 posted on 11/01/2005 8:46:15 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah blah blah......


56 posted on 11/01/2005 8:48:13 AM PST by b4its2late (If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . . . . . .
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . . . . snarf, snort, sniff . . . .

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


58 posted on 11/01/2005 8:52:01 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

"...a thoughtful hearing". I thought the Senate was going to consider his credentials. The two aren'r really very compatible.


59 posted on 11/01/2005 8:52:38 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

What we currently know about Judge Alito raises serious questions about whether he will be steadfast in protecting our most fundamental rights.

since when is killing babies a fundemental right?


61 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:13 AM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
What we currently know about Judge Alito raises serious questions about whether he will be steadfast in protecting our most fundamental rights.

What are these "most fundamental rights" for hillary and the other Democrats? Are they "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"? I don't think so.

Behind these appealing words lie some unpleasant realities. The most fundamental right for Democrats is the "constitutional right" proclaimed in Roe and Casey to kill babies whenever it is convenient. The other "fundamental right," proclaimed by SCOTUS this past year, is to commit buggery, advocate it publicly, teach it to small children in public schools, and persecute anyone who disagrees with you as a homophobe guilty of committing hate crimes.

62 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:42 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I have a theory, maybe someone can confirm.

Hillary is playing it safe because Alito is the son of an Italian immigrant from NJ. The Bush administration covered its base by nominating Alito and now if the confirmation fight goes into 06 then she could stand to lose the support of some of her immigrant vote.
73 posted on 11/01/2005 9:41:14 AM PST by nettuno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I have a theory, maybe someone can confirm.

Hillary is playing it safe because Alito is the son of an Italian immigrant from NJ. The Bush administration covered its base by nominating Alito and now if the confirmation fight goes into 06 then she could stand to lose the support of some of her immigrant vote.
74 posted on 11/01/2005 9:42:42 AM PST by nettuno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I intend to closely examine Judge Alito’s record and qualifications and carefully monitor the Judiciary Committee hearings in order to determine whether he intends to be a guardian of the rule of law who puts fairness and justice before ideology.

It's too bad you don't apply such standards to liberal nominees as well, b*tch.
75 posted on 11/01/2005 9:43:20 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"... our most fundamental rights"

HillarySpeak for abortion-on-demand.

76 posted on 11/01/2005 9:44:24 AM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson