Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Fight Worth Having: Sam Alito is on everybody's list of the top
Opinion Journal (WSJ) ^ | November 1, 2005 | Editorial

Posted on 11/01/2005 1:21:45 AM PST by Jim Robinson

With yesterday's nomination of Sam Alito to the Supreme Court, President Bush reached into his John Roberts playbook to name a judicial conservative with impeccable credentials. The nominee deserves to be confirmed easily and soon, and he likely will be--though not without a tougher fight and probably with a smaller margin of Democratic support.

Like Chief Justice Roberts, Judge Alito is one of the leading jurists on the federal bench, having been appointed to the Third Circuit by the first President Bush and confirmed unanimously by a Democratic-controlled Senate. Before that he served as an assistant solicitor general in the Reagan Administration, arguing 12 cases before the Supreme Court; as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey; and as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel. No one can say he isn't qualified.

However, Judge Alito has put in 15 years on the federal bench, compared with Mr. Roberts's two, and produced a far longer list of judicial opinions that are now being scrutinized for evidence of what kind of Justice he would make. The left is already attacking his rulings, which we agree are notable, but less for their outcomes than for their legal reasoning. Judge Alito shows every sign of being a careful constitutionalist with a deep respect for precedent.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alito; hero; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: mariabush

Strategery.


21 posted on 11/01/2005 3:48:33 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I am thinking the same thing--what with Harriet's withdrawal coming at such an opportune time...but the genius will be that we'll never ever know. :)
22 posted on 11/01/2005 3:48:54 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tame

BATTLE ON!!

23 posted on 11/01/2005 3:50:16 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
If nothing else it resulted in a conservative shot across the bow of the mushy moderate Republicans and Red State Democrats about the strength of the Conservative Wing and the real mind of the American voters.

Reid is going to have a tough time keeping the Dems together on this one.

24 posted on 11/01/2005 3:51:09 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There was going to be a fight regardless. With Alito we at least have a nominee worth fighting for.


25 posted on 11/01/2005 3:51:50 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent article. It's right on.


26 posted on 11/01/2005 3:53:21 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

"Anyone else wonder if that whole Miers thing wasn't "laying smoke" for what may turn into the mother of all battles with the 'Rats..."

Wonder, yes, but I don't think that was the plan. The Miers nomination was too badly botched; I think that President Bush wanted Ms. Miers, he simply overplayed his hand with conservatives. And I also think that the nomination dragged on too long for it to be a decoy.

Good recovery after the fumble, though.

(I have to admit that this all makes you wonder if President Bush has been keeping a copy of "The Discourses" under his pillow.)


27 posted on 11/01/2005 3:58:10 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

You might be on to something, as Friday's news sure did not make the splash the lying corrupt liberals had hoped for, and wow, not even that tea sipping super sleuth of the century got much tube face time.


28 posted on 11/01/2005 3:58:46 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
I hope the Surrendering Senate Seven realize THIS is the battle worthy of using the Constitutional Option.

Graham and Dewine have said that the nomination of Alito to Associate Justice postion of SCOTUS is not "extraordinary circumstances."

But Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, fired back Sunday, saying that if the Democrats staged a filibuster against Judge Alito or Judge Luttig because of their conservatism, "the filibuster will not stand."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/31/politics/politicsspecial1/31confirm.html


Gang-of-14 member Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH): "I can't believe anyone would believe this is a nominee that could be filibustered or that it would rise to the level of `extraordinary circumstances. If someone would filibuster, though, I would be prepared to vote to change the rules."

http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=10963


29 posted on 11/01/2005 3:59:26 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

i suggested something similar as a joke a few days ago...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1510376/posts?page=61#61


30 posted on 11/01/2005 4:02:07 AM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I hope the gang of seven Republicans realize that if they don`t support this nomination up to and including pushing the big red button that conservatives will leave all of them on their own in 2006.
If that means a loss of the Senate I wonder how Mc Cain and the bunch will like having offices smaller than a phone booth with no TV cameras in sight.
31 posted on 11/01/2005 4:05:57 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

"Reid is going to have a tough time keeping the Dems together on this one."

I don't like to count chickens before they're hatched, but this is probably going to be a win for the President. The key is not so much the Democrats, but the so-called "moderate" Republicans.


32 posted on 11/01/2005 4:11:08 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

read later


33 posted on 11/01/2005 4:21:03 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa; Jim Robinson
Anyone else wonder if that whole Miers thing wasn't "laying smoke" for what may turn into the mother of all battles with the 'Rats...Misunderestimated again?

Its' that Famous "Right Jab/Left Hook" combination again, from the Gulf War I.

"Thumbnail" Definition of Stupid: Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.

...kinda like the African American Voters voting for the 'Rats' political candidates (basing their votes on unrealized promises made) and expecting a different outcome, not realizing they're on "a Liberal Plantation" :(

...or GOP taking some Voters' beliefs for granted...until recently...(hope...I don't get banned.) Thanks, JimRob :D

34 posted on 11/01/2005 4:33:54 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Peach; Mo1; Molly Pitcher
Meanwhile, liberal interest groups are massing for battle--though this is as much about raising money for the 2006 election as it is about defeating Judge Alito.

Doesn't that just say it all. Good article, worth the registration.

35 posted on 11/01/2005 4:43:02 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
The fact that Chuck Schumer hates him is enough for me.

..very, very efficient.

Sen. Reid's/Botox "Nancy" Pelosi's/"Swimmer / RAdm. Green Oldsmobile" (HIC!) Kennedy (his Congressional Staffs' comments. :) for me.

36 posted on 11/01/2005 4:44:53 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

As long as our Republican Senators are up to the fight, I'm all for it. It's long past time that the country get an education in the tactics of the left and just whether or not legal abortion is going to be permitted to stand.

Sadly, however, our Republican Senators have shown little willingness to engage in the battle.


37 posted on 11/01/2005 5:10:56 AM PST by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve
Hopefully, he has no skeletons...

Even if he doesn't, the Liberals character assassins will be sure to manufacture some, ala Clarence Thomas, or totally vicious slander, ala Robert Bork.

This will be one nasty fight for Judge Alito. IMHO, we will win it and the one for the next vacancy will be even nastier, if possible. Stalinists don't go easily into the dark night!

38 posted on 11/01/2005 5:19:29 AM PST by Gritty ("We've gone from a representative democracy to a judicial monarchy - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
re: "designed play"/Miers.

I don't think Rove is that Machiavellian. I think, rather, when given a lemon (lack of conservative and Senate support), they put together some excellent lemonade. Turned a minus into a plus--and when you do that well, it looks planned.

I hope the libs think that's what happened. They'll be wild with rage...

39 posted on 11/01/2005 5:22:55 AM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Even if he doesn't, the Liberals character assassins will be sure to manufacture some...

Just so, but the imaginary ones are much easier to fight than the real ones. Just ask Bernard Kerrick.

40 posted on 11/01/2005 5:33:54 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson