[leadpenny]

Kinda pickin' at nits, imo. They were indictments that came out of the CIA leak investigation.

[rabair]

if they had changed "indictment" to "investigation" in the headline, I might not have cared... or even putting the word "investigation" before "indictment" in the headline.. but calling it a "leak indictment" is straight up lying. Not just keeping it short to make it easier, it's lying...

[DoughtyOne]

Actually, I consider it to be a big deal. Not telling the truth or perjury is not the same as ratting out a member of the CIA.

Reuters is revealing one of two things here, an agenda and or grossly incompetent staff.

[newzjunkey]

Their headline is sensationalism and inaccurate. This stuff matters because many people don't look beyond the headlines. They know exactly what they're doing when they write something like this. It's their craft; it's their profession to know.

Cheney's name is used only to grab attention.

[jess35]

You mean the leak that wasn't a leak?

[sgtyork]

Some may call it picking at nits...

...others would call it adhering to proper legal distinctions that were delineated by the prosecutor himself in his announcement on Friday!

These were indictments for perjury and obstruction of justice and were not related to leaking. This isn't hard, read!