To: agere_contra
They got nothing The top deputy to the Vice President is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice and thats 'nothing'?
I'm not happy about this but I'm not going to dismiss it either. If Libby lied he should be charged.
8 posted on
10/28/2005 10:20:39 AM PDT by
conserv13
To: conserv13
I agree. I mean it's the same charge we got Clinton on.
14 posted on
10/28/2005 10:22:44 AM PDT by
TheSane
To: conserv13
Agreed, but so far every description of the "lie" seems awfully unimportant.
15 posted on
10/28/2005 10:22:46 AM PDT by
Williams
To: conserv13
The top deputy to the Vice President is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice and thats 'nothing'? They could charge him with murder and it wouldn't be true either.
Look, I take your point: but he's innocent until proven guilty.
To: conserv13
They got nothing on the underlying crime. They got an "entrapment" indictment which is a whole different kettle of fish. The Special Counsel had to manufacture a crime to justify the expenditure of several million dollars investigating a non-event.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
36 posted on
10/28/2005 10:31:19 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: conserv13
The top deputy to the Vice President is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice and thats 'nothing'? I'm not happy about this but I'm not going to dismiss it either. If Libby lied he should be charged.And, not only that, IF he lied, there's a reason which is not yet apparant.
90 posted on
10/28/2005 11:05:36 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act - Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson