Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
She was prosecuted for a number of charges. The jury decided that she was not guilty of 1st degree murder, but they couldn't agree if she was guilty of voluntary manslaughter or not.

This was a retrial only on the charges that the jury couldn't decide on.

27 posted on 10/28/2005 10:32:43 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

Well, let's face it. If she was tried for anything, it should have been manslaughter. Heat of the moment kind of thing, diminished capacity.

I don't understand how it can come out of a grand jury to indict her on multiple counts for the same offense... and without Grand Jury approval, the prosecution should be stuck twiddling his thumbs.

The whole deadlocked jury/mistrial thingy is a MISUNDERSTANDING of the intent. And I've read alot of it.
They wanted to insure that UNLESS THERE WAS A UNANIMOUS verdict, then no crime had been committed. A cultural sort of thing, if the folks themselves could not even agree that what the person did was a crime, the government was powerless to prosecute.

It's not supposed to be a "give the government unlimited shots at getting a conviction" thing.


34 posted on 10/28/2005 10:40:15 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson