To: gondramB
Russert just appeared on NBC. HE IS DENYING THE FACTS AS PRESENTED IN THE INDICTMENT. He says he testified under oath that he did not receive any information from Libby about Plame as the inictment alleges. This is important if it shows that Fitzgerald is going beyond the facts of the case to draw political blood.
154 posted on
10/28/2005 10:03:58 AM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Why them isn't RUSSERT being charged with Perjury?
Interesting....
To: FreedomCalls
Very interesting statement from Russert.
182 posted on
10/28/2005 10:06:14 AM PDT by
carl in alaska
(Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Kerry's speeches are just one big snore.)
To: FreedomCalls
Whoa!! That would be something if that is true. Fitzy is making up testimony?
183 posted on
10/28/2005 10:06:16 AM PDT by
Rokurota
(.)
To: FreedomCalls
Get him under oath again and he'll probably change his story. Like all of them. Say one thing to the public then when push comes to shove and their butt's are on the line the real story comes out. Games, all games...
197 posted on
10/28/2005 10:08:00 AM PDT by
rip033
(.)
To: FreedomCalls
Russert just appeared on NBC. HE IS DENYING THE FACTS AS PRESENTED IN THE INDICTMENT. He says he testified under oath that he did not receive any information from Libby about Plame as the inictment alleges. Now this is getting interesting.
201 posted on
10/28/2005 10:08:47 AM PDT by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: FreedomCalls
looks like fitz lied! lets get him under oath ;)
212 posted on
10/28/2005 10:10:06 AM PDT by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: FreedomCalls
If that's true, then I expect Libby's lawyers to get a court to throw out the indictments on the ground Fitzgerald misrepresented the essence of Russert's testimony to the GJ. So then it comes down to two different recollections of events. That's not a crime much less than perjury. It seems to me the prosecutor's case looks week. There's not even an underlying crime here.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
215 posted on
10/28/2005 10:10:15 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: FreedomCalls
Unbelievable! We can only hope for a speedy trial and get the Wilsons on the stand. These are trumped up charges and should be tossed.
271 posted on
10/28/2005 10:20:55 AM PDT by
SueRae
To: FreedomCalls
How weak does your case have to be when a dem like Russert will not even bite the bullet and back up your case against a Republican.
To: FreedomCalls
I saw that and got the impression he was a bit nervous, un-nerved. Did you?
383 posted on
10/28/2005 10:42:48 AM PDT by
freema
(Proud Marine Mom)
To: FreedomCalls
In the press conference Fritz said Russert did not talk to Libby about Plame while Scooter told investigators they had. Fitz was adamant that they knew Scooter had lied. He was so emphatic on this point that I wondered if there was tape or if it was only Russert's vs. Libby's word under oath.
564 posted on
10/28/2005 12:26:58 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(CA: YES on Prop 73-77! Unions outspending Arnold 3:1, HELP: http://www.joinarnold.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson