Skip to comments.
Libby indicted on obstruction of justice, false statement and perjury charge - RESIGNS
http://drudgereport.com/ ^
| October 28, 2005
Posted on 10/28/2005 9:45:41 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
Libby indicted on obstruction of justice, false statment and perjury charge...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beltwaywarzone; cialeak; fitz; fitzgerald; hero; indictment; judymiller; libby; liberalinquisition; liedtofbi; liedtograndjury; marthastewart2; martyr; mattcooper; obstruction; pardon; phishing; plame; politicalpersecution; timrussert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 741-751 next last
To: fatnotlazy
and what is more, freepers are already going to send him away, having convicted.
The only reason why clinton was not sent away, was that 'you can not indict a sitting presidue' THen lott called the evidence in the senate trial garbage.
401
posted on
10/28/2005 10:46:42 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: MortMan
Miller was given the chance to correct her testimony after being prompted by Fitzgerald's revealing evidence of a meeting she forgot. Why wasn't Libby given the same opportunity and/or latitude? I think Miller should have been indicted too. She lied, plane and simple. She was trying to cover for Libby, denying the June meeting happened. But to get the goods on Libby, Fitzgerald had to get her notes, and her testimony. Libby wasn't about to testify against Judy Miller.
To: goldstategop
I agree. Thanks for the reply.
403
posted on
10/28/2005 10:47:20 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: elc
Its BS. Fitzgerald is admitting Valerie Plame worked for the CIA and every one's status there is classified as a matter of record. But that doesn't make her a covert agent. Again, the law was not broken. Libby may have lied to be sure but that's completely different from what the Special Counsel was named to look into.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
404
posted on
10/28/2005 10:47:32 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Cato_The_Younger; Jim Robinson
"
...the GOP still seems to believe that we can work with and compromise with these Leftist traitors..."
The only way to deal with those who'd seek to destroy you is to incapacitate them fully - absolutely no compromise, no yield, no waiver.
I think Jim's FR mission statement is the epitome of that sentiment.
405
posted on
10/28/2005 10:49:09 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Thank you! I learned something today.
406
posted on
10/28/2005 10:49:38 AM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(Free Republic = the people's think tank.)
To: All
Libby said he told Russert he didn't know for sure that she worked for the CIA. Russert says Libby never indicated he wasn't sure.
This fascinating case could easily be lifted from today's headlines and made into the lamest episode of Law & Order ever.
407
posted on
10/28/2005 10:50:10 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Jokelahoma
408
posted on
10/28/2005 10:50:30 AM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(Free Republic = the people's think tank.)
Comment #409 Removed by Moderator
To: ImphClinton
I don't know if you're hot, but I do think you're warm....
410
posted on
10/28/2005 10:51:49 AM PDT
by
freema
(Proud Marine Mom)
To: Cato_The_Younger
I am not one for wild theories or hyperbole, however, I do believe we are living in a time where some kind of battle is going to take place between the left and right in this country.
411
posted on
10/28/2005 10:52:38 AM PDT
by
HOYA97
(Hoya Saxa = What Rocks)
To: consinmd
So maybe Libby will be found not guilty by a jury, maybe he won't.Right....a jury full of DC democrats.
To: fooman
no indictment for an actual crime. talk radio will be all over this. Half of what prosecutors do is total bullshit, just trying to trip people up and charge them with something new.
To: MEG33
According to the idictment Valerie was "classified". Doesn't say anything about "covert" but does say few people knew it.....like any of that matters if she is not covert. Did Fitz find a way to slide around that law?
414
posted on
10/28/2005 10:53:12 AM PDT
by
daybreakcoming
(May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
To: carl in alaska; goldstategop; Dems_R_Losers; expatpat; chronic_loser
One can shred, overwrite, and defrag all one wants, but the only way to truly "erase" a drive/disk is with a sledgehammer.
415
posted on
10/28/2005 10:53:17 AM PDT
by
Pirate21
(The liberal media are as sheep clearing the path along which they will be lead to the slaughter.)
To: tomahawk
Fitzgerald will blow his career with this indictment. I think your right.
416
posted on
10/28/2005 10:54:31 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: Certain_Doom
No, the news commies didn't break in when Hillary was indicted by a grand jury for making false statements. Wait a minute. She wasn't indicted. That must have just been a wet dream we all had.
To: carl in alaska; goldstategop; Dems_R_Losers; expatpat; chronic_loser
What specific act was listed for the charge under Section 1503?
418
posted on
10/28/2005 10:55:04 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: Stuart Scott
Comment #420 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 741-751 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson