I don't really like the word "fundies" all that much. It's a categorical thing that isn't necessarily all-inclusive.
I think creationists is better, and YECCERs works for the Young-earth types. Not all fundamentalists fit those categories.
That said, there sure are a lot of lies going around out there on some creationism web sites.
You're probably right. However, I was attempting to compare them to some fundamentalist Moslems, and was trying to keep in an apple-to-apple thing.
Even "creationists" isn't a flawless term, although it might be the best of a not-so-good set of choices.
Too often people who believe in both God and science get offended by some posts making statements about "creationists", because they think we're talking about anyone who believes in God, since belief in God comes with the belief that God created the universe, and this makes them "creationists" in the broad (and most literal) sense of the word. They think we're bashing all Christians or all religious people of any denomination.
We're not, of course. Many of the "evolutionists" on these threads are themselves also religious.
When we use the word "creationist", we mean it in the more narrow sense of the word, as exemplified by Duane Gish, Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, Henry and John Morris, et al. Even "fundamentalist creationist" isn't right, because there are many varieties of fundamentalist creationists -- not all out to lunch on this topic -- plus there are fringe creationists who aren't specifically fundamentalists.
The best phrase I've thought of so far (and it's still less than perfect) is "anti-evolution creationist" (or "AECreationist" for short), since the key thing the "wacko creationists" have in common is a rabid opposition to evolution and other fields of science which they feel are "opposed to" their brand of creationism.
But if anyone can think of a better word, especially one less unwieldy, I'd be glad to adopt it.