Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buckingham seesaws on the stand [Dover trial 10/28/05]
York (PA) Daily Record ^ | 10/28/05 | MIKE ARGENTO

Posted on 10/28/2005 7:08:15 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor

HARRISBURG — It was surely one of the most anticipated moments in the history of federal jurisprudence, the appearance, finally, of former Dover Area School Board member Bill Buckingham at the Dover Panda Trial. And it did not disappoint. It was, in the truest sense of the word, unbelievable.

Really.

Unbelievable.

At the onset of his stay on the witness stand, Buckingham raised his right hand and swore, or affirmed, to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Then, for the record, he stated his name.

"William Buckingham."

By the time he left the stand, six hours later, I almost expected the judge to ask him for a photo ID to make sure he was indeed William Buckingham.

A telling moment came when he was asked about how the Dover Area High School had acquired 60 copies of the book "Of Pandas and People," a brilliantly dumb book that promotes the idea of intelligent design.

In a deposition given in January, he said he didn't know how the district got the books. He said he didn't know who donated the books. He said he didn't ask because he didn't want to know. He said he didn't know who donated the money to buy the books.

So, during his testimony Thursday, Steve Harvey, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, asked Buckingham about the books and how the money was raised to buy them. He specifically asked Buckingham whether he raised the money at his church.

He said he hadn't.

Then, he said he had.

Then, he said he hadn't.

He said he stood before the congregation one Sunday morning and said "there was a need" for money to buy "Of Pandas and People" and if anyone wanted to give, they could.

"But I didn't ask anyone for money," he said.

Harvey asked him whether he took up a collection at his church, Harmony Grove Community Church.

"Not as such," Buckingham said.

So the lawyer asked him whether he got in front of the congregation and asked for donations.

"I didn't," Buckingham said.

He paused.

"I'm sorry, I did say that, but there was more to it," he said.

Anyway, he collected the money — wherever it came from — and then he wrote a check for $850 to Donald Bonsell, father of then-school board President Alan Bonsell.

But previously, when asked by the lawyer about who donated the books, he said he didn't know.

"Mr. Buckingham, you lied to me at your deposition ... isn't that true?" Harvey asked.

"How so?" Buckingham responded.

It went on for a while before Judge John E. Jones III told Harvey to move on.

"You made your point very effectively," the judge said.

Earlier, Harvey had made an even more effective point.

Buckingham said he never read about his adventures on the school board in the newspapers and never talked to anyone about them. He also said he never mentioned creationism at school board meetings or in the press or anywhere, for that matter.

So at the time the board was talking about creationism, Buckingham granted an interview to a Fox 43 news reporter. I guess he forgot about that new-fangled invention, videotape.

On the tape, which you can see at http://www.ydr.com/mmedia/multi/528, Buckingham, wearing the same lapel pin he wore in court Thursday, said he wanted to balance evolution in the classroom with something else, "such as creationism."

Oops.

He said that the reporter "ambushed" him and that he was "like a deer in the headlights of a car" and that the newspapers were all reporting that he and the board were talking about creationism and that he thought to himself, "Don't say creationism."

Double oops.

It was like he had a Homer Simpson moment. He was thinking "Don't say creationism. Don't say creationism. Don't say creationism." And then he opens his yap and says "creationism."

D'oh!

And to compound the prevarication, he said he was thinking about something the newspapers reported — something he didn't read or talk to anybody about.

It went on like that all day. He'd say he voted for buying a new biology book. Then, he said he voted against it. He said he thought intelligent design was a scientific theory. But he said he didn't know what intelligent design was. He said he wasn't the force behind the board adopting intelligent design and then, confronted with what he said, under oath, previously, he'd say maybe he was.

He said a lot of things, and then he'd say a lot of things that weren't exactly what he had said to begin with.

And then, he attributed his spotty, selective and just plain weird memory to his OxyContin addiction.

Unbelievable.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bearingfalsewitness; creationist; crevolist; dover; evolution; misspeaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Right Wing Professor

I think it's a good thing this witness will never have to go up against a prosecutor like Fitzpatrick. He would be looking at 400 consecutive life sentences.


41 posted on 10/28/2005 9:39:10 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

Actually, the old one's full.


42 posted on 10/28/2005 9:43:12 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Maybe they haven't got their talking points together yet.

We don't need no stinkin' talking points.


43 posted on 10/28/2005 9:43:55 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Don't give them any ideas.


44 posted on 10/28/2005 9:45:00 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

How about the DI is the Keystone Corps(e)?


45 posted on 10/28/2005 9:45:40 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: doc30
I suspect they have posted the DI's spin on the situation and are 'enjoying' all the positive aspects of the trial.

They don't do reality too well.
46 posted on 10/28/2005 9:48:37 AM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
"Actually, the old one's full."

Full of what?

Sorry, you kind of walked into that one.;>

47 posted on 10/28/2005 9:52:45 AM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
"How about the DI is the Keystone Corps(e)?

I like it. It will be my new tagline.

48 posted on 10/28/2005 9:54:56 AM PDT by b_sharp (The DI is the Keystone Corps(e))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: doc30
With most of the Dover threads, there's lots of input by Creationist/IDers. Where are they today? Or is Friday their new Sabbath day?

I've noticed a distinct fall off in creationist input to these threads as the cross-examinations of the pro-ID witnesses proceeds. It probably isn't anything to do with statements like (to paraphrase:

With testimony like this from the IDers who needed mainstream science witnesses? Of course there are still a few posters who think that Behe et al are performing "real well".

49 posted on 10/28/2005 9:55:17 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Feminized androgenous automaton euro-weenie blackguard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
Don't give them any ideas.

I'm not giving them ideas. Dembski is alredy pushing Intelligent Evolution.

50 posted on 10/28/2005 9:55:56 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Time for the snake to shed the ID skin and move on to Intelligent Evolution.

Well, it'll take more than a search-n-replace to update "Of Pandas and People".

51 posted on 10/28/2005 10:25:47 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
So the lawyer asked him whether he got in front of the congregation and asked for donations. "I didn't," Buckingham said. He paused. "I'm sorry, I did say that, but there was more to it," he said. Anyway, he collected the money — wherever it came from — and then he wrote a check for $850 to Donald Bonsell, father of then-school board President Alan Bonsell. But previously, when asked by the lawyer about who donated the books, he said he didn't know. "Mr. Buckingham, you lied to me at your deposition ... isn't that true?" Harvey asked. "How so?" Buckingham responded. It went on for a while before Judge John E. Jones III told Harvey to move on.

There are no creationist liars. Only creationist misspeakers.

52 posted on 10/28/2005 10:26:51 AM PDT by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
Depends what the meaning of "is" is

He didn't make a collection. He stood before the congregation and said they needed money. OTHER people made a collection and gave him the money.

It's a minor distinction, but it can seem hugh when you're hepped up on goof-balls.

53 posted on 10/28/2005 10:35:22 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Clinton left several legacies and this is one.


54 posted on 10/28/2005 10:41:16 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

it


55 posted on 10/28/2005 10:42:14 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
I've seen it called "Lying for God" on some of these threads and inside, I've always objected.

Have you ever seen a creationist explicitly defend the practice? That is, can you cite an account of a creationist explicitly defending lying as a valid technique for attacking evolution?
56 posted on 10/28/2005 10:47:51 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws

dude!


57 posted on 10/28/2005 10:55:12 AM PDT by b_sharp (The DI is the Keystone Corps(e))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

This liar is lying because he's scared he'll go to hell if he doesn't lie to promote a religion that says he'll go to hell for lying.


58 posted on 10/28/2005 11:18:15 AM PDT by shuckmaster (Bring back SeaLion and ModernMan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

No.


59 posted on 10/28/2005 11:42:43 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Bush killed da mama.


60 posted on 10/28/2005 11:46:02 AM PDT by spunkets (I'd post Swaggert, but the only one I got's on the cover of Penthouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson