Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

The logic is quite twisted:

* Libby must be convicted of perjury because this was a very important crime being investigate.

* To indict on perjury, it must be material to the case.

* The case is important because Plame's identity was classified.

* There is no law specifically prohibiting leaking classified material to the press.

This is circular at best. Am I missing something?


2,388 posted on 10/28/2005 11:52:08 AM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2366 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Hill
Am I missing something?

No. You're not missing anything. It's all just nuts.

2,402 posted on 10/28/2005 11:53:10 AM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2388 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Nice list. You're missing this one:

* It is irrelevant to the case who sent Wilson on the trip whether it was his wife or someone else, so the lies that got this whole thing started don't matter.


2,405 posted on 10/28/2005 11:53:33 AM PDT by cgk (Delay/Weldon '08: That's the ticket! // QUAGMIERS: Punidtry's present, predictable predicament.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2388 | View Replies ]

How about knowing the TRUTH of whether Valerie Plame was or was not COVERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He is right. I do want to reach through my TV, but not to ask him to tell me all he knows.


2,445 posted on 10/28/2005 11:56:29 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson