Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luke21

She was a conservative, you dolt. She just apparently didn't attend enough Federalist Society D&D Friday Nights for some people's taste.


931 posted on 10/27/2005 7:05:01 AM PDT by AmishDude (Welcome to the judicial oligarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude

She was a conservative, you dolt.

Maybe you need to shoe a few more mares to relieve some stress, Amish. Jimminy Christmas, picking a nominee from your work group was a bad decision in the first place. Didn't the president think that her documents would be requested, thus triggering the attorney-client priviledge argument? It was a waste of time. You have to remember there are 535 people in congress that want to be president and they will want some answers to a stealth candidate, conservate or not.


961 posted on 10/27/2005 7:08:41 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet (Let it begin now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude

No, instead she attended cosmic bowl at the local alley. Who cares, right? Your argument is silly and shows that you haven't paid any attention to the substance of the objections to Miers.


962 posted on 10/27/2005 7:08:42 AM PDT by dinoparty (In the beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude

There is absolutely NO evidence Harriet Miers is a conservative. Changing parties does not mean she changed beliefs.


1,286 posted on 10/27/2005 7:53:25 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson