To: Mr. Jeeves
E.D. Hill just said that a list of people he was considering asked to be removed because they didn't want to go through the hearings process. Can you blame them?
33 posted on
10/27/2005 5:58:20 AM PDT by
estrogen
(I)
To: estrogen
Several of the top names thrown around here (PO, JRB, etc) were supposedly asked and most, if not all, said emphatically, that they had NOT asked to be removed from consideration. So I dont know who was on that short list that asked to be removed.
864 posted on
10/27/2005 6:56:04 AM PDT by
Tatze
(I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
To: estrogen
E.D. Hill just said that a list of people he was considering asked to be removed because they didn't want to go through the hearings process. Can you blame them?I'll go through the hearing. Nominate me!
I almost made Pope!
916 posted on
10/27/2005 7:03:07 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
To: estrogen
1,054 posted on
10/27/2005 7:19:31 AM PDT by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: estrogen
and any liberal judge would GLADLY accept a nomination knowing he or she wouldn't be asked anything but "softball questions."
1,363 posted on
10/27/2005 8:02:31 AM PDT by
Muzzle_em
(I'm an island awash in a sea of stupidity)
To: estrogen
E.D. Hill just said that a list of people he was considering asked to be removed because they didn't want to go through the hearings process. Can you blame them? Give us the list ... so that we can determine for ourselves whether or not this is true.
1,743 posted on
10/27/2005 8:56:11 AM PDT by
caryatid
(All good things which exist are the fruits of originality. [John Stuart Mill])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson