OMG you have to talk to a nominee personally before you can form an opinion?!?!?!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I must have missed my invite to the meet 'n greet!
***
If YOU would have paid attention, you would have known I was talking about the confirmation hearing. How about canning the sarcasm? It just makes you look particularly childish.
Suits me fine if you would rather just jump to conclusions instead of forming an opinion based on actual knowledge (as opposed to reliance upon innuendo, rumor, gossip and half truths) and a complete investigation of the facts. Trouble is that those like you who would rather form opinions based on the rants of some screaming blogger or biased webmaster will continue to make selection of a good judge, if not impossible, then at least more difficult than it needs to be. We will continue to have judges just like the current crop we already have.
Ah, so Miers' speeches, vacant resume, and other published facts regarding her are simply dismissed with a wave of the hand?
You may choose to ignore all that verified, undisputed information, but to simply close your eyes, cover your ears, and say "blah blah I'm not listening" -- well, you might understand why I can't take you seriously.
Trouble is that those like you who would rather form opinions based on the rants of some screaming blogger or biased webmaster
All these vicious attacks. Poor ignorant baby.